International Representation in US Social-Science Journals

In this paper we examine the publication of international articles in the two leading journals in sociology, the American Sociological Review and the American Journal of Sociology . The most prominent journals in several other social-science fields, namely economics, demography, political science an...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	The American sociologist 2020-06, Vol.51 (2), p.215-239
Main Authors:	Jacobs, Jerry A., Mizrachi, Nissim
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Alternative approaches Authorship College faculty Demography Educational research Occupational mobility Political science Social Sciences Sociological imagination Sociological research Sociology
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	In this paper we examine the publication of international articles in the two leading journals in sociology, the American Sociological Review and the American Journal of Sociology . The most prominent journals in several other social-science fields, namely economics, demography, political science and education, are included for purposes of comparison. “International” is defined alternatively with respect to topics and authors. The journal with the least representation of international topics is the American Educational Research Journal , followed by the two leading sociology journals. The journal Demography is also more international in focus than are ASR and AJS . Economics, as represented by the American Economic Review , and political science, as represented by the American Political Science Review , are the most international of this set of fields. The rank order of journals follows largely the same pattern when the focus shifts to international authorship rather than international subject matter. Foreign first authors are not uncommon, but many of these authors received their PhD degrees from a university based in the US or held a faculty position in the US. Co-authorship teams are most likely to be all US authors, but cross-national teams are not at all uncommon. Our findings suggest that a disproportionate focus on the U.S. may limit the sociological imagination and result in an impoverished sociological toolkit that is ill-suited for understanding the global reality of deeply diverse and divided societies. In addition, the opportunity structure available to sociologists around the globe is somewhat skewed. Foreign sociologists who rely upon publication in US journals for career advancement may find themselves at a disadvantage.
ISSN:	0003-1232 1936-4784