PD and joint application design: a transatlantic comparison

Joint application design (JAD) and participatory design (PA) - well-known methodologies for operationalizing user involvement and user participation - have established themselves as influential thrusts in software development. Both JAD and PA focus on facilitated interactions between users and desig...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Communications of the ACM 1993-06, Vol.36 (6), p.40-48
Main Authors: Carmel, Erran, Whitaker, Randall, George, Joey
Format: Magazinearticle
Language:eng
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Joint application design (JAD) and participatory design (PA) - well-known methodologies for operationalizing user involvement and user participation - have established themselves as influential thrusts in software development. Both JAD and PA focus on facilitated interactions between users and designers wherein dynamic group techniques are employed for eliciting and refining ideas. They differ in points of user particiaption, participant identity, participant selection, technical staff and facilitator participation, team orientation, structure, and development speed. They also differ in their goals. JAD, the most common user-involvement methodology in North America, is intended to accelerate the design of information systems and promote comprehensive, high-quality results. PD, often termed the Scandinavian approach to systems development, seeks to accentuate the social context of the workplace and promote workers' control over their work and their lives. A careful analysis and comparison of JAD and PA is presented.
ISSN:0001-0782
1557-7317