Spatial transitions in tree cover are associated with soil hydrology, but not with grass biomass, fire frequency, or herbivore biomass in Serengeti savannahs

Although there is a well‐known association between tree cover and soil texture in savannahs, the hydrological drivers of tree cover variation have not been systematically explored, particularly in parallel with factors such as fire, herbivory, and tree–grass interactions. The relationship between hy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of ecology 2020-03, Vol.108 (2), p.586-597
Main Authors: Holdo, Ricardo M., Onderdonk, Daphne A., Barr, Annabelle G., Mwita, Meshak, Anderson, T. Michael, Oliveras, Imma
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Annual precipitation
Annual variations
Biomass
drainage
Fires
Gradients
Graph theory
Grasses
Habitats
Herbivores
Herbivory
Hydrologic data
Hydrology
Image classification
Imagery
Moisture content
National parks
Occupancy
plant–soil interactions
Precipitation
Satellite imagery
Savannahs
Soil
Soil dynamics
Soil hydrology
Soil mapping
Soil moisture
Soil properties
Soil texture
soil water potential
Soils
Spaceborne remote sensing
stress
Texture
tree cover
Trees
tree‐grass dynamics
tropical savannas
Variation
Wastewater
Water content
Water potential
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Although there is a well‐known association between tree cover and soil texture in savannahs, the hydrological drivers of tree cover variation have not been systematically explored, particularly in parallel with factors such as fire, herbivory, and tree–grass interactions. The relationship between hydrological factors and tree cover is important for resolving the relative contribution of bottom‐up versus top‐down factors in structuring savannah vegetation. We quantified soil moisture dynamics across eight 1‐km transects spanning tree cover gradients from open to woody savannah in Serengeti National Park in Tanzania using soil moisture sensors coupled with dataloggers. We mapped tree cover at two spatial scales through supervised classification of high‐resolution satellite imagery. We simultaneously produced water retention curves in open and woody habitats within each transect to compare soil hydrological properties and to convert volumetric water content (θ) from dataloggers to plant‐available water over the course of an annual cycle. We also quantified grass biomass at 100 locations per transect, estimated fire frequency from MODIS satellite data, and quantified herbivore occupancy with paired camera traps situated in open and woody habitats within each transect. We found a positive relationship between tree cover and soil moisture drainage rate, and found that open habitats had more negative water potentials than woody habitats for a given value of θ. In contrast, we found no evidence for a consistent relationship between grass biomass or fire frequency and tree cover. We found evidence for higher browser occupancy in woody than open habitats, but no habitat effects on herbivores as a group (browsers plus grazers), suggesting that herbivory is unlikely to be the dominant factor explaining variation in tree cover. Synthesis. Our results suggest that variation in tree cover is partly driven by hydrological (edaphic) factors unrelated to fire, herbivory, tree–grass interactions or mean annual precipitation at these spatial scales in Serengeti. We contrast our findings with previous work attributing tree cover shifts in Serengeti to precipitation gradients. The factors responsible for spatiotemporal variation in tree cover in the savannah biome have received a great amount of attention, but much of the focus has been on climate, fire and herbivory. We show that tree cover and the extent to which it can vary may be strongly constrained by edaphic factors and
ISSN:0022-0477
1365-2745
DOI:10.1111/1365-2745.13303