Loading…
One‐year clinical outcome of biodegradable polymer sirolimus‐eluting stent in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction: Insight from the ULISSE registry
Background The ULISSE registry has demonstrated the real‐world performance of the Ultimaster biodegradable polymer sirolimus‐eluting stent (BP‐SES) in a large cohort of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, including a large proportion of patients presenting with acute myocardial i...
Saved in:
Published in: | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2019-12, Vol.94 (7), p.972-979 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
The ULISSE registry has demonstrated the real‐world performance of the Ultimaster biodegradable polymer sirolimus‐eluting stent (BP‐SES) in a large cohort of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, including a large proportion of patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
Methods
We performed a subgroup analysis of the ULISSE registry in AMI patients and compared the outcomes of this vulnerable cohort with that of patients presenting without AMI (non‐AMI). The primary end point was the incidence of 1‐year target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV‐MI), and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (TLR).
Results
Of 1,660 patients included in the ULISSE registry, 381(23%) presented with AMI, 207(54.3%) non‐ST elevation myocardial infarction, and 174(45.7%) ST‐elevation myocardial infarction. Compared with non‐AMI patients, those with AMI were more frequently female and smokers, with lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis. At 1 year, TLF rate was significantly higher in AMI than non‐AMI patients (7.9 vs. 4.1%; HR 1.98, CI 95% 1.22–3.23; p = .005) driven by higher rate of cardiac death (4.0 vs. 1.1%; HR 3.59, CI 95% 1.64–7.88; p = .01) and TV‐MI (2.8 vs 0.9%; HR 2.99,CI 95% 1.22–7.37; p = .01), without differences in TLR rate (4.3 vs. 2.9%,HR 0.66, CI95% 0.35–1.25; p = .2). At multivariate Cox regression analysis, eGFR |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1522-1946 1522-726X |
DOI: | 10.1002/ccd.28305 |