Is There an Expert in the House? Thomson v. Christie's: The Case of the Houghton Urns
The May 2004 decision of the London High Court in the matter of Thomson v. Christie's captured the interest of the salacious British press for its glamorous players: the Canadian heiress, the English aristocrat, and the international auction house. Taylor Thomson, the daughter of billionaire ne...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of cultural property 2005-08, Vol.12 (3), p.425-441 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The May 2004 decision of the London High Court in the matter of
Thomson v. Christie's captured the interest of the salacious
British press for its glamorous players: the Canadian heiress, the English
aristocrat, and the international auction house. Taylor Thomson, the
daughter of billionaire newspaper baron, Lord Thomson of Fleet, sued both
the Marquess of Cholmondeley, a bachelor filmmaker with a fortune valued
at over £100 million, and Christie's Auction House, for
misrepresenting a pair of gilt and porphyry urns she purchased from
Cholmondeley at a Christie's sale in London in 1994 for just under
£2 million. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0940-7391 1465-7317 |