Loading…

Endotracheal tube cuff pressure contiuous monitoring in intensive care units patients

Context: Endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff pressure should be kept within an optimal range to ensure positive ventilation and prevent the aspiration of oral and gastric contents while maintaining tracheal perfusion. Aims: The aims of the study are to assess the ETT cuff pressure using continuous monitori...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of nursing and midwifery sciences (Online) 2018-04, Vol.5 (2), p.63-67
Main Authors: Taslimi, Leila, Tahere Mohamadi Khaleghdoost, Ghanbari, Atefeh Khanghah, Ehsan Leili Kazemnezhad
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Context: Endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff pressure should be kept within an optimal range to ensure positive ventilation and prevent the aspiration of oral and gastric contents while maintaining tracheal perfusion. Aims: The aims of the study are to assess the ETT cuff pressure using continuous monitoring. Settings and Design: This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 61 orally intubated patients receiving mechanical ventilation admitted to the intensive care unit's educational therapeutic hospitals in Rasht in the summer of 2013. Material and Methods: The measurements were carried out using a monitor-connected transducer for 6 h for each unit of study during in two shifts of morning and evening. Variables such as age, sex, diagnosis type, body mass index, and days intubated were investigated. Due to the noninterventional nature of the study, according to the Ethics Committee with registration number 9053, it was not necessary to obtain consent from the patients or their legal guardianship. Statistical Analysis Used: All data obtained was analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (t-test, analysis of variance, and Pearson). Results: This study showed that cuff pressure in 90.2% of cases was in normal range (20–30 H2O) and only one person (1.6%) had a pressure of
ISSN:2345-5756
2345-5764
DOI:10.4103/JNMS.JNMS_18_18