Municipal wastewater treatment costs with an emphasis on assimilation wetlands in the Louisiana coastal zone

•Cost for assimilation wetlands averaged $0.60/gallon of treatment capacity.•2° and 3° treatment costs averaged $4.90 and $6.50/gallon, respectively.•Wetland assimilation is less sensitive to cost increases than traditional systems. In recent decades, water quality standards for wastewater treatment...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological engineering 2019-10, Vol.137, p.21-25
Main Authors: Hunter, Rachael G., Day, John W., Wiegman, Adrian R., Lane, Robert R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Alternative energy sources
Assimilation
Biological assimilation
Capacity
Coastal zone
Computer simulation
Construction
Construction costs
Construction planning
Cost analysis
Costs
Crude oil
Disinfectants
Disposal sites
Effluent treatment
Energy
Energy costs
Energy requirements
Forested wetlands
Freshwater
Inflation
Inland water environment
Labour
Maintenance costs
Municipal wastewater
Oxidation
Oxidation ponds
Plant construction
Pollutants
Pollution control
Quality standards
Secondary treatment
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
Tertiary
Tertiary treatment
Tertiary wastewater treatment
Waste stabilization ponds
Wastewater treatment
Wastewater treatment costs
Wastewater treatment plants
Water quality
Water quality standards
Water treatment
Wetland assimilation
Wetlands
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Cost for assimilation wetlands averaged $0.60/gallon of treatment capacity.•2° and 3° treatment costs averaged $4.90 and $6.50/gallon, respectively.•Wetland assimilation is less sensitive to cost increases than traditional systems. In recent decades, water quality standards for wastewater treatment have become more stringent, increasing costs and energy required to reduce pollutants. Wetland assimilation is a low-cost and low-energy alternative to traditional tertiary wastewater treatment where secondarily treated and disinfected municipal effluent is discharged primarily into freshwater forested wetlands in coastal Louisiana. In this paper, costs per gallon of treatment capacity for conventional secondary and tertiary treatment were compared to those for assimilation wetlands. Cost analysis reports were used to determine costs per gallon of treatment capacity for conventional wastewater treatment facilities, including costs for conveyance between the collection system and the assimilation wetland site, and between the treatment and disposal sites if they could not be co-located. Capital and operation and maintenance costs were considered. Because all wastewater treatment plants are required to treat at least to secondary standards, costs for primary and secondary treatment were combined. If necessary, these costs were adjusted for inflation to 2017 dollars using an average inflation rate of 2.19 percent and a cumulative inflation rate of 50.84 percent. To determine costs per gallon of treatment capacity for assimilation wetlands, actual costs provided by the project engineer were used when available. To simulate the future costs of facility construction and compare the replacement costs of conventional secondary and tertiary wastewater treatment facilities and treatment wetlands in the context of energy prices, U.S. Bureau of Labor and Statistics (BLS) data for the price index for inputs to construction were used, as were the Energy Information Administration (EIA) data for the price of crude oil to model future wastewater treatment plant construction and operation costs. The cost for the Mandeville assimilation wetland included $1 million for the price of the land. Future costs of treatment facility construction and operation were modeled relative to average price of construction inputs between 1998 and 2015 using the projected price of crude oil. When treatment costs were compared among secondary, tertiary, and assimilation wetlands, mean cost for assi
ISSN:0925-8574
1872-6992
DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.09.020