Loading…
Observed El Niño‐La Niña Asymmetry in a Linear Model
Previous studies indicate an asymmetry in the amplitude and persistence of El Niño (EN) and La Niña (LN) events. We show that this observed EN‐LN asymmetry can be captured with a linear model driven by correlated additive and multiplicative (CAM) noise, without resorting to a deterministic nonlinear...
Saved in:
Published in: | Geophysical research letters 2019-08, Vol.46 (16), p.9909-9919 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Previous studies indicate an asymmetry in the amplitude and persistence of El Niño (EN) and La Niña (LN) events. We show that this observed EN‐LN asymmetry can be captured with a linear model driven by correlated additive and multiplicative (CAM) noise, without resorting to a deterministic nonlinear model. The model is derived from 1‐month lag statistics taken from monthly sea surface temperature (SST) data sets spanning the twentieth century, in an extension of an empirical‐dynamical technique called Linear Inverse Modeling. Our results suggest that noise amplitudes tend to be stronger for EN compared to LN events, which is sufficient to generate asymmetry in amplitude and also produces more persistent LN events on average. These results establish a null hypothesis for EN‐LN asymmetry and suggest that strong EN events may not be more predictable that what can be accounted for by a multivariate linear system driven by CAM noise.
Key Points
El Niño‐La Niña asymmetry, usually associated with deterministic nonlinearity, may also be generated by a stochastically forced linear model
A linear model forced by “correlated additive‐multiplicative noise” is empirically calculated from observed Tropical Pacific SST data
Our linear model generates El Niño‐La Niña amplitude and persistence asymmetry consistent with observations (5th–95th confidence interval) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0094-8276 1944-8007 |
DOI: | 10.1029/2019GL082922 |