The rise of multi-objective forestry paradigm in the Finnish print media

In this paper, we examine the recent history of Finnish forest policy from the perspective of competing forest discourses. The data consist of 164 randomly selected forest-related articles from five Finnish magazines and newspapers published in 1977, 1997, and 2017. Qualitative content analysis and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Forest policy and economics 2019-09, Vol.106, p.101973, Article 101973
Main Authors: Takala, Tuomo, Lehtinen, Ari, Tanskanen, Minna, Hujala, Teppo, Tikkanen, Jukka
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Advocacy
Cleavage
Content analysis
Critical discourse analysis
Discourse analysis
Forest conservation
Forest management
Forest policy
Forest products
Forestry
Forests
Hegemony
Mass media
Multiple objective analysis
Nature conservation
NMDS
Production
Prominences
Qualitative analysis
Recreation
Sustainability
Sustainable development
Timber
Wood
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this paper, we examine the recent history of Finnish forest policy from the perspective of competing forest discourses. The data consist of 164 randomly selected forest-related articles from five Finnish magazines and newspapers published in 1977, 1997, and 2017. Qualitative content analysis and quantitative multivariate methods (NMDS) were combined in our mixed-method critical discourse analysis. Four forest discourses were identified. The hegemonic, utilitarian wood production discourse emphasised effective wood production and use, but also included nature conservation as an explicit objective for forest use by the 1990's. This turn into the multi-objective forestry paradigm was an initial victory for the subordinate, counteracting pro-nature discourse, but the wood production discourse quickly turned the paradigm into its own benefit. Despite this, the pro nature expanded its prominence in between the 1990's and the 2010's. The hegemonic recreation discourse, which arose in between the 1970's and the 1990's, emphasised positive experiences in the forest and was compatible with both the wood production discourse and the pro nature discourse. The small, hegemonic non-timber forest products discourse existed consistently through the study period. Within the wood production discourse, the present paradigm of multi-objective forestry creates an illusion that sustainability issues are in control, and the positive narration on nature produced by the recreation discourse supports this illusion. At the same time, the pro nature discourse expands its prominence in the Finnish society, deepening the cleavage between those who advocate the wood production discourse and the others. The great future challenge for both the pro nature and wood production discourse – and for the Finnish forest policy in general – is to think how to break these discoursal hinders for the sustainable development. •Changes in the Finnish print media's forest discourses were analysed.•One subordinate and three hegemonic discourses were identified.•The hegemonic wood production discourse is slowly losing its superior prominence.•Discourses that stress nature conservation and recreation are strengthening.•However, discoursal conditions for sustainable forest policy and use are still weak.
ISSN:1389-9341
1872-7050
DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101973