Loading…
Charitable programs and the retailer: do they mix?
As cause marketing promotions become more prevalent, retailers must develop an increasing understanding of how consumers evaluate such offers. Using attribution theory and the gift-giving literature, we derive four predictions about conditions that may lead cause-marketing efforts to be evaluated mo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of retailing 2000, Vol.76 (3), p.393-406 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | As cause marketing promotions become more prevalent, retailers must develop an increasing understanding of how consumers evaluate such offers. Using attribution theory and the gift-giving literature, we derive four predictions about conditions that may lead cause-marketing efforts to be evaluated more positively. The conditions are
donation situation (disaster vs. ongoing cause),
congruency of donations with the firm’s core business,
effort exerted by the firm, and commitment of the firm to the cause.
We employed an experiment to test our expectations across two retail contexts: grocery and building supply stores. Across both stores, respondent evaluations were more positive for disaster-related as compared to ongoing causes, and for donations involving greater effort (i.e., product rather than cash contributions). There were no differences in evaluations related to the firm’s degree of commitment (i.e., the retailer matching vs. not matching consumers’ donations). This was surprising because the greater commitment condition doubled the contribution to the cause.
Differences between stores were found for congruency of the donated product with the retailer’s core business. For grocery stores, there was no difference; however for the building supply store, consumers rated the incongruent product donation (i.e., food and cleaning supplies) more positively than the congruent donation (i.e., building supplies). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-4359 1873-3271 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0022-4359(00)00032-4 |