Constructing Wars

In his monumental play Hamlet, Shakespeare (1609/1992) displays one of his most brilliant insights: that human beings do not need “great causes” to fight—they can wage war over the most seemingly minor issue; they can manufacture a great “argument” and “causes” out of nothing and magnify group-based...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Peace and conflict 2019-05, Vol.25 (2), p.109-110
Main Author: Moghaddam, Fathali M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aggressiveness
Bystander Effect
Bystanders
Collective representation
Conflict
Democracy
Group identity
Human
Human Rights
Human rights violations
Ingroup Outgroup
Intergroup relations
Meaning
Perpetrators
Political Radicalism
Radicalism
Terrorism
Victimization
Victims
Violations
Violence
War
Witnesses
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In his monumental play Hamlet, Shakespeare (1609/1992) displays one of his most brilliant insights: that human beings do not need “great causes” to fight—they can wage war over the most seemingly minor issue; they can manufacture a great “argument” and “causes” out of nothing and magnify group-based differences to justify violence against outgroups. This trend is reflected in the contents of the current issue of the journal. In addition to three major articles, two Brief Research Reports, one book review essay, and one book review, we have a Special Section on democracy and security that includes six brief articles and an introduction. The three major articles are on the theme of how individuals move in the direction of radicalization and terrorism (Milla, 2019), become passive bystanders and witnesses of conflicts and violations of human rights (Passini, 2019), and retain fluid social representations of past conflicts (Bouchat et al., 2019). In all three articles, the meaning and significance of conflict is changing and socially constructed, not static and fixed. The jihadi willing to sacrifice the self to inflict harm on others, the bystander remaining as a passive onlooker in the face of violence and human rights violations, and remembrances and reconstructions of the “Great War”—these all depend on subjective and changing interpretations. Although the meaning of conflict can be changing in the minds of perpetrators of aggression, unfortunately the consequences of such aggression for victims is all too real and in important respects continual. Two Brief Reports examine the psychological consequences of terror on Pakistani (Ehsan, Riaz, & Khalily, 2019) and Yezidi (Msall, 2019) victims. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)
ISSN:1078-1919
1532-7949
DOI:10.1037/pac0000393