Loading…

Genetic mapping in grapevine using SNP microarray intensity values

Genotyping microarrays are widely used for genetic mapping, but in high-diversity organisms, the quality of SNP calls can be diminished by genetic variation near the assayed nucleotide. To address this limitation in grapevine, we developed a simple heuristic that uses hybridization intensity to gene...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Molecular breeding 2015-03, Vol.35 (3), p.1-12, Article 88
Main Authors: Myles, Sean, Mahanil, Siraprapa, Harriman, James, Gardner, Kyle M., Franklin, Jeffrey L., Reisch, Bruce I., Ramming, David W., Owens, Christopher L., Li, Lin, Buckler, Edward S., Cadle-Davidson, Lance
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Genotyping microarrays are widely used for genetic mapping, but in high-diversity organisms, the quality of SNP calls can be diminished by genetic variation near the assayed nucleotide. To address this limitation in grapevine, we developed a simple heuristic that uses hybridization intensity to genetically map phenotypes without the need to distinguish between polymorphic states. We applied this approach to the mapping of three previously mapped traits, each controlled by single major effect loci—color, flower sex, and powdery mildew resistance—and confirmed that intensity values outperform SNP calls in all cases. Further, because per sample cost is a major limitation to the adoption of genotyping microarrays in applied genetic research and plant breeding, we tested how many samples were required to map a Mendelian trait in an F1 grape population and found that we could identify the correct genomic region with as few as 12 samples. For high-diversity species for which genotyping arrays are available or under development, our findings suggest a powerful and cost-effective approach to identify large-effect QTL when faced with poor SNP quality.
ISSN:1380-3743
1572-9788
DOI:10.1007/s11032-015-0288-3