Loading…

Volumetric assessment of glioblastoma and its predictive value for survival

Background The objective of this study was to evaluate the morphology of glioblastoma on structural pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), defining imaging prognostic factors. Method We conducted a retrospective analysis of MR images from 114 patients harboring a primary glioblastoma, derive...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta neurochirurgica 2019-08, Vol.161 (8), p.1723-1732
Main Authors: Henker, Christian, Hiepel, Marie Cristin, Kriesen, Thomas, Scherer, Moritz, Glass, Änne, Herold-Mende, Christel, Bendszus, Martin, Langner, Sönke, Weber, Marc-André, Schneider, Björn, Unterberg, Andreas, Piek, Jürgen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background The objective of this study was to evaluate the morphology of glioblastoma on structural pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), defining imaging prognostic factors. Method We conducted a retrospective analysis of MR images from 114 patients harboring a primary glioblastoma, derived from two neurosurgical departments. Tumor segmentation was carried out in a semi-automated fashion. Tumor compartments comprised contrast-enhancing volume (CEV + ), perifocal hyperintensity on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images (FLAIR+) excluding CEV+, and a non-enhancing area within the CEV+ lesion (CEV − ). Additionally, two ratios were calculated from these volumes, the edema-tumor ratio (ETR) and necrosis-tumor ratio (NTR). All patients received surgical resection, followed by concomitant radiation and chemotherapy. Results Tumor segmentation revealed the strongest correlation between the CEV+ volume and the CEV−, presenting intratumoral necrosis ( p  
ISSN:0001-6268
0942-0940
DOI:10.1007/s00701-019-03966-6