Identifiability, state repression, and the onset of ethnic conflict

When do persecuted ethnic minority groups choose to assimilate into the dominant majority group, rather than differentiate from it, and how do states respond? We argue that any answer to these questions must consider the joint effects of identity on state repression and the possibility of ethnic con...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public choice 2019-12, Vol.181 (3/4), p.399-422
Main Authors: Mele, Christine S., Siegel, David A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Assimilation
Differentiation
Dissent
Economics
Economics and Finance
Ethnic conflict
Ethnic groups
Ethnic identity
Ethnic relations
Ethnicity
Identity
Majority groups
Minority & ethnic groups
Minority & ethnic violence
Minority groups
Mobilization
Oppression
Political Science
Public Finance
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:When do persecuted ethnic minority groups choose to assimilate into the dominant majority group, rather than differentiate from it, and how do states respond? We argue that any answer to these questions must consider the joint effects of identity on state repression and the possibility of ethnic conflict. We posit two mechanisms through which identity acts: (1) mobilization and (2) operational capacity, defined as the ability of the group to contest state repression successfully. We show that minority groups may choose assimilation, even when differentiation would aid them in mobilization against the state, for a tactical reason: the benefits from improved mobilization may be outweighed by costly reductions in operational capacity. Efforts to assimilate emerge when the state cannot be indiscriminate in countering dissent, or when members of the minority group can more easily pass as members of the majority. Repressive states, in anticipation, will hinder assimilation by accentuating fundamental differences between groups.
ISSN:0048-5829
1573-7101
DOI:10.1007/s11127-019-00664-w