Policy-Relevant Publications and Tenure Decisions in International Relations

Many observers of the international relations (IR) discipline express concern about the decline in policy-relevant research within the academy. Some blame an academic culture and academic institutions that incentivize abstract, quantitative, or theoretical work that speaks to scholarly debates rathe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PS, political science & politics political science & politics, 2019-04, Vol.52 (2), p.318-324
Main Authors: Maliniak, Daniel, Peterson, Susan, Tierney, Michael J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Academic tenure
Beliefs
Colleges & universities
Departments
Electronic Publishing
Government School Relationship
Intellectuals
International organizations
International relations
Periodicals
Political Issues
Political science
Politics
Polls & surveys
Quantitative analysis
Scholars
Schools
Tenure
The Profession
Theory Practice Relationship
Web Sites
World problems
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Many observers of the international relations (IR) discipline express concern about the decline in policy-relevant research within the academy. Some blame an academic culture and academic institutions that incentivize abstract, quantitative, or theoretical work that speaks to scholarly debates rather than real-world problems. This article asks how IR scholars value both scholarly and policy publications. Using data from the TRIP survey, we found that publications generally considered policy relevant are undervalued in academic tenure decisions. These findings hold regardless of whether faculty have attained tenure or whether they consider their own research to be policy relevant. However, scholars who consult, teach at colleges rather than research universities, or teach in Association of Professional Schools of International Affairs schools rather than political science departments are likely to believe: (1) that policy-relevant research products are currently valued more highly than their colleagues estimate; and (2) on the normative question, that these policy publications should be valued even more highly than they are. Overall, these results suggest an openness to increasing the value of policy-relevant research in tenure decisions as part of an effort to increase the amount of policy-focused work in the discipline.
ISSN:1049-0965
1537-5935
DOI:10.1017/S1049096518001804