Loading…
Lex Loci Delictus and Global Economic Welfare: Spinozzi v. ITT Sheraton Corp
The traditional choice-of-law rule for tort was lex loci delictus - the law of the place where the plaintiff suffered the wrong. In Spinozzi vs. ITT Sheraton Corp, Judge Richard Posner presented a full-throated defense of the traditional lex loci rule in the context of a transnational tort. The plai...
Saved in:
Published in: | Harvard law review 2007-03, Vol.120 (5), p.1137-1147 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The traditional choice-of-law rule for tort was lex loci delictus - the law of the place where the plaintiff suffered the wrong. In Spinozzi vs. ITT Sheraton Corp, Judge Richard Posner presented a full-throated defense of the traditional lex loci rule in the context of a transnational tort. The plaintiff in Spinozzi suffered serious injuries when he fell into a maintenance pit at a Sheraton hotel while on vacation in Acapulco Mexico. The district court held that Mexican law governed the case and precluded the plaintiff's recovery because Mexican law makes contributory negligence a complete defense to negligence liability and the uncontested facts showed that Spinozzi had been contributorily negligent. A unanimous Seventh Circuit panel, in an opinion by Judge Posner, affirmed. Judge Posner argued that because each jurisdiction has a comparative regulatory advantage with respect to events within its territory, the lex loci rule is efficient. Judge Posner was right to argue that application of the lex loci rule in cases of transnational torts promotes economic efficiency - but perhaps for the wrong reason. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0017-811X 2161-976X |