Gauging two sides of regional economic resilience in Western Germany—Why sensitivity and recovery should not be lumped together

The paper empirically investigates the economic resilience of Western German regions in the wake of the Great Recession of 2008/2009. In particular, the focus is laid on the influence of regional agglomeration economies (arising from specialisation, related and unrelated variety) and the explicit su...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft 2018-10, Vol.38 (2), p.141-189
Main Authors: Pudelko, Franziska, Hundt, Christian, Holtermann, Linus
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agglomeration
Economic conditions
Economics
Economics and Finance
Environmental Economics
Gaging
Geography
Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning
Original Paper
Population Economics
Recovery
Regional development
Regional/Spatial Science
Resilience
Sensitivity
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The paper empirically investigates the economic resilience of Western German regions in the wake of the Great Recession of 2008/2009. In particular, the focus is laid on the influence of regional agglomeration economies (arising from specialisation, related and unrelated variety) and the explicit subdivision of short-term resilience into sensitivity and recovery. The necessity to distinguish between different factors and phases is well documented by means of the spatial lag and OLS regression results as all three types of agglomeration economies reveal varying, if not opposing directions of influences across the sensitivity and recovery phase. A pregnant example refers to regional specialisation. Not only does it increase sensitivity while exerting a positive influence during the recovery phase, but it is also mediated by the regional share in manufacturing workforce. This workforce reveals opposing phase-specific effects itself. Hence, ignoring the two-component structure of short-term resilience entails the risk of imprecise, if not false conclusions on the driving mechanisms stabilising and/or destabilising regional economies in times of crisis.
ISSN:0173-7600
1613-9836
DOI:10.1007/s10037-018-0124-4