Risky business: Qualitative study of exposure to hazards and perceived safety of non-clinical staff working in mental health services

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe the experiences of non-clinical staff working in psychiatric settings, particularly in relation to exposure to context-specific hazards, and perceived safety. Design/methodology/approach Qualitative interviews with 23 administrative and operational st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of workplace health management 2018-07, Vol.11 (3), p.177-188
Main Authors: Donovan, Stephanie, Duncan, Jordan, Patterson, Sue
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Abuse
Aggression
Assaults
Design
Ethics
Exposure
Hazards
Infectious diseases
Labor force
Mental disorders
Mental health care
Occupational exposure
Occupational health
Occupational safety
Occupational stress
Patients
Psychological distress
Qualitative analysis
Questionnaires
Safety
Self destructive behavior
Social support
Stress management
Verbal abuse
Violence
Workforce
Workplace violence
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe the experiences of non-clinical staff working in psychiatric settings, particularly in relation to exposure to context-specific hazards, and perceived safety. Design/methodology/approach Qualitative interviews with 23 administrative and operational staff were analysed using a framework approach. Findings Analysis demonstrated extensive exposure to occupational violence, including assault and verbal abuse within and/or beyond the workplace and concern about infectious disease. Impact of exposure was wide ranging, dependent on type and circumstances of violence and personal resources, with several participants experiencing ongoing psychological distress. Participants employed a range of problem- and emotion-focused strategies, typically seeking support from peers, to manage work-related stress but felt neglected by the organisation. They sought inclusion in or access to processes, such as supervision and debrief, routinely available to clinicians and to information about risk associated with patients. Research limitations/implications Generalisability is constrained by conduct of this study in a particular setting with non-random sample. Practical implications The findings of this paper indicate a pressing need for administrators to ensure efforts to address safety encompass all staff, and the need for further research. Particular attention should be given to enabling non-clinical staff to examine ethical questions, ensuring access to support mechanisms and development of an inclusive culture. Originality/value While exposure to, and impact of workplace violence on clinical staff have been extensively studied, this paper is the first to qualitatively examine the safety of a commonly forgotten workforce.
ISSN:1753-8351
1753-836X
DOI:10.1108/IJWHM-02-2018-0013