Flood hazard assessment from storm tides, rain and sea level rise for a tidal river estuary

Cities and towns along the tidal Hudson River are highly vulnerable to flooding through the combination of storm tides and high streamflows, compounded by sea level rise. Here a three-dimensional hydrodynamic model, validated by comparing peak water levels for 76 historical storms, is applied in a p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Natural hazards (Dordrecht) 2020-06, Vol.102 (2), p.729-757
Main Authors: Orton, P. M., Conticello, F. R., Cioffi, F., Hall, T. M., Georgas, N., Lall, U., Blumberg, A. F., MacManus, K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bayesian analysis
Channel flow
Civil Engineering
Climate
Climatology
Computer simulation
Cyclones
Dynamics
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Environmental Management
Environmental risk
Estuaries
Estuarine dynamics
Extratropical cyclones
Extreme weather
Flood hazards
Flood insurance
Flood risk
Flooding
Floods
Friction resistance
Geophysics/Geodesy
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Hazard assessment
Hurricanes
Hydrodynamic models
Hydrodynamics
Hydrogeology
Mathematical models
Natural Hazards
Offshore
Original Paper
Probability theory
Rain
Rainfall
Rivers
Sea level
Sea level rise
Sea surface
Sea surface temperature
Statistical analysis
Stochasticity
Storm surges
Storm tides
Storms
Stream discharge
Stream flow
Surface temperature
Three dimensional models
Tidal rivers
Tides
Tributaries
Tropical cyclones
Water depth
Water levels
Water resistance
Watersheds
Wind speed
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-3e6108ab23b0e548eacc000ba35d1c7ceb720662fbbcb4e9286c5040adc5122f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-3e6108ab23b0e548eacc000ba35d1c7ceb720662fbbcb4e9286c5040adc5122f3
container_end_page 757
container_issue 2
container_start_page 729
container_title Natural hazards (Dordrecht)
container_volume 102
creator Orton, P. M.
Conticello, F. R.
Cioffi, F.
Hall, T. M.
Georgas, N.
Lall, U.
Blumberg, A. F.
MacManus, K.
description Cities and towns along the tidal Hudson River are highly vulnerable to flooding through the combination of storm tides and high streamflows, compounded by sea level rise. Here a three-dimensional hydrodynamic model, validated by comparing peak water levels for 76 historical storms, is applied in a probabilistic flood hazard assessment. In simulations, the model merges streamflows and storm tides from tropical cyclones (TCs), offshore extratropical cyclones (ETCs) and inland “wet extratropical” cyclones (WETCs). The climatology of possible ETC and WETC storm events is represented by historical events (1931–2013), and simulations include gauged streamflows and inferred ungauged streamflows (based on watershed area) for the Hudson River and its tributaries. The TC climatology is created using a stochastic statistical model to represent a wider range of storms than is contained in the historical record. TC streamflow hydrographs are simulated for tributaries spaced along the Hudson, modeled as a function of TC attributes (storm track, sea surface temperature, maximum wind speed) using a statistical Bayesian approach. Results show WETCs are important to flood risk in the upper tidal river (e.g., Albany, New York), ETCs are important in the estuary (e.g., New York City) and lower tidal river, and TCs are important at all locations due to their potential for both high surge and extreme rainfall. The raising of floods by sea level rise is shown to be reduced by ~ 30–60% at Albany due to the dominance of streamflow for flood risk. This can be explained with simple channel flow dynamics, in which increased depth throughout the river reduces frictional resistance, thereby reducing the water level slope and the upriver water level.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11069-018-3251-x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2015566162</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2015566162</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-3e6108ab23b0e548eacc000ba35d1c7ceb720662fbbcb4e9286c5040adc5122f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMouP75AN4CXo3OJG3aHmVxVVjwoiB4CGk61S7bZk26y-qnt6WCJ08Dw--9N_MYu0C4RoDsJiKCLgRgLpRMUewP2AzTTAnIEzhkMygkClDwesxOYlwBIGpZzNjbYu19xT_stw0VtzFSjC11Pa-Db3nsfWh531QUr3iwTcdtV_FIlq9pR2semki89oHbEbLjYkeBU-y3NnydsaPariOd_85T9rK4e54_iOXT_eP8dimcQt0LRRoht6VUJVCa5GSdA4DSqrRClzkqMwlay7osXZlQIXPtUkjAVi5FKWt1yi4n303wn9sh3Kz8NnRDpJGAaar18OtA4US54GMMVJtNaNrhTINgxg7N1KEZOjRjh2Y_aOSkiQPbvVP4c_5f9AP9IHUc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2015566162</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flood hazard assessment from storm tides, rain and sea level rise for a tidal river estuary</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Orton, P. M. ; Conticello, F. R. ; Cioffi, F. ; Hall, T. M. ; Georgas, N. ; Lall, U. ; Blumberg, A. F. ; MacManus, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Orton, P. M. ; Conticello, F. R. ; Cioffi, F. ; Hall, T. M. ; Georgas, N. ; Lall, U. ; Blumberg, A. F. ; MacManus, K.</creatorcontrib><description>Cities and towns along the tidal Hudson River are highly vulnerable to flooding through the combination of storm tides and high streamflows, compounded by sea level rise. Here a three-dimensional hydrodynamic model, validated by comparing peak water levels for 76 historical storms, is applied in a probabilistic flood hazard assessment. In simulations, the model merges streamflows and storm tides from tropical cyclones (TCs), offshore extratropical cyclones (ETCs) and inland “wet extratropical” cyclones (WETCs). The climatology of possible ETC and WETC storm events is represented by historical events (1931–2013), and simulations include gauged streamflows and inferred ungauged streamflows (based on watershed area) for the Hudson River and its tributaries. The TC climatology is created using a stochastic statistical model to represent a wider range of storms than is contained in the historical record. TC streamflow hydrographs are simulated for tributaries spaced along the Hudson, modeled as a function of TC attributes (storm track, sea surface temperature, maximum wind speed) using a statistical Bayesian approach. Results show WETCs are important to flood risk in the upper tidal river (e.g., Albany, New York), ETCs are important in the estuary (e.g., New York City) and lower tidal river, and TCs are important at all locations due to their potential for both high surge and extreme rainfall. The raising of floods by sea level rise is shown to be reduced by ~ 30–60% at Albany due to the dominance of streamflow for flood risk. This can be explained with simple channel flow dynamics, in which increased depth throughout the river reduces frictional resistance, thereby reducing the water level slope and the upriver water level.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-030X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11069-018-3251-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Bayesian analysis ; Channel flow ; Civil Engineering ; Climate ; Climatology ; Computer simulation ; Cyclones ; Dynamics ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Environmental Management ; Environmental risk ; Estuaries ; Estuarine dynamics ; Extratropical cyclones ; Extreme weather ; Flood hazards ; Flood insurance ; Flood risk ; Flooding ; Floods ; Friction resistance ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences ; Hazard assessment ; Hurricanes ; Hydrodynamic models ; Hydrodynamics ; Hydrogeology ; Mathematical models ; Natural Hazards ; Offshore ; Original Paper ; Probability theory ; Rain ; Rainfall ; Rivers ; Sea level ; Sea level rise ; Sea surface ; Sea surface temperature ; Statistical analysis ; Stochasticity ; Storm surges ; Storm tides ; Storms ; Stream discharge ; Stream flow ; Surface temperature ; Three dimensional models ; Tidal rivers ; Tides ; Tributaries ; Tropical cyclones ; Water depth ; Water levels ; Water resistance ; Watersheds ; Wind speed</subject><ispartof>Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2020-06, Vol.102 (2), p.729-757</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-3e6108ab23b0e548eacc000ba35d1c7ceb720662fbbcb4e9286c5040adc5122f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-3e6108ab23b0e548eacc000ba35d1c7ceb720662fbbcb4e9286c5040adc5122f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3708-5661</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Orton, P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conticello, F. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cioffi, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, T. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgas, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lall, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blumberg, A. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacManus, K.</creatorcontrib><title>Flood hazard assessment from storm tides, rain and sea level rise for a tidal river estuary</title><title>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Nat Hazards</addtitle><description>Cities and towns along the tidal Hudson River are highly vulnerable to flooding through the combination of storm tides and high streamflows, compounded by sea level rise. Here a three-dimensional hydrodynamic model, validated by comparing peak water levels for 76 historical storms, is applied in a probabilistic flood hazard assessment. In simulations, the model merges streamflows and storm tides from tropical cyclones (TCs), offshore extratropical cyclones (ETCs) and inland “wet extratropical” cyclones (WETCs). The climatology of possible ETC and WETC storm events is represented by historical events (1931–2013), and simulations include gauged streamflows and inferred ungauged streamflows (based on watershed area) for the Hudson River and its tributaries. The TC climatology is created using a stochastic statistical model to represent a wider range of storms than is contained in the historical record. TC streamflow hydrographs are simulated for tributaries spaced along the Hudson, modeled as a function of TC attributes (storm track, sea surface temperature, maximum wind speed) using a statistical Bayesian approach. Results show WETCs are important to flood risk in the upper tidal river (e.g., Albany, New York), ETCs are important in the estuary (e.g., New York City) and lower tidal river, and TCs are important at all locations due to their potential for both high surge and extreme rainfall. The raising of floods by sea level rise is shown to be reduced by ~ 30–60% at Albany due to the dominance of streamflow for flood risk. This can be explained with simple channel flow dynamics, in which increased depth throughout the river reduces frictional resistance, thereby reducing the water level slope and the upriver water level.</description><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Channel flow</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climatology</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Cyclones</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Estuarine dynamics</subject><subject>Extratropical cyclones</subject><subject>Extreme weather</subject><subject>Flood hazards</subject><subject>Flood insurance</subject><subject>Flood risk</subject><subject>Flooding</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Friction resistance</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Hazard assessment</subject><subject>Hurricanes</subject><subject>Hydrodynamic models</subject><subject>Hydrodynamics</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Natural Hazards</subject><subject>Offshore</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sea level</subject><subject>Sea level rise</subject><subject>Sea surface</subject><subject>Sea surface temperature</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stochasticity</subject><subject>Storm surges</subject><subject>Storm tides</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Stream discharge</subject><subject>Stream flow</subject><subject>Surface temperature</subject><subject>Three dimensional models</subject><subject>Tidal rivers</subject><subject>Tides</subject><subject>Tributaries</subject><subject>Tropical cyclones</subject><subject>Water depth</subject><subject>Water levels</subject><subject>Water resistance</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><subject>Wind speed</subject><issn>0921-030X</issn><issn>1573-0840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMouP75AN4CXo3OJG3aHmVxVVjwoiB4CGk61S7bZk26y-qnt6WCJ08Dw--9N_MYu0C4RoDsJiKCLgRgLpRMUewP2AzTTAnIEzhkMygkClDwesxOYlwBIGpZzNjbYu19xT_stw0VtzFSjC11Pa-Db3nsfWh531QUr3iwTcdtV_FIlq9pR2semki89oHbEbLjYkeBU-y3NnydsaPariOd_85T9rK4e54_iOXT_eP8dimcQt0LRRoht6VUJVCa5GSdA4DSqrRClzkqMwlay7osXZlQIXPtUkjAVi5FKWt1yi4n303wn9sh3Kz8NnRDpJGAaar18OtA4US54GMMVJtNaNrhTINgxg7N1KEZOjRjh2Y_aOSkiQPbvVP4c_5f9AP9IHUc</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Orton, P. M.</creator><creator>Conticello, F. R.</creator><creator>Cioffi, F.</creator><creator>Hall, T. M.</creator><creator>Georgas, N.</creator><creator>Lall, U.</creator><creator>Blumberg, A. F.</creator><creator>MacManus, K.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3708-5661</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Flood hazard assessment from storm tides, rain and sea level rise for a tidal river estuary</title><author>Orton, P. M. ; Conticello, F. R. ; Cioffi, F. ; Hall, T. M. ; Georgas, N. ; Lall, U. ; Blumberg, A. F. ; MacManus, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-3e6108ab23b0e548eacc000ba35d1c7ceb720662fbbcb4e9286c5040adc5122f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Channel flow</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climatology</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Cyclones</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Estuarine dynamics</topic><topic>Extratropical cyclones</topic><topic>Extreme weather</topic><topic>Flood hazards</topic><topic>Flood insurance</topic><topic>Flood risk</topic><topic>Flooding</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Friction resistance</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Hazard assessment</topic><topic>Hurricanes</topic><topic>Hydrodynamic models</topic><topic>Hydrodynamics</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Natural Hazards</topic><topic>Offshore</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sea level</topic><topic>Sea level rise</topic><topic>Sea surface</topic><topic>Sea surface temperature</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stochasticity</topic><topic>Storm surges</topic><topic>Storm tides</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Stream discharge</topic><topic>Stream flow</topic><topic>Surface temperature</topic><topic>Three dimensional models</topic><topic>Tidal rivers</topic><topic>Tides</topic><topic>Tributaries</topic><topic>Tropical cyclones</topic><topic>Water depth</topic><topic>Water levels</topic><topic>Water resistance</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><topic>Wind speed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Orton, P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conticello, F. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cioffi, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, T. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgas, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lall, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blumberg, A. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacManus, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Orton, P. M.</au><au>Conticello, F. R.</au><au>Cioffi, F.</au><au>Hall, T. M.</au><au>Georgas, N.</au><au>Lall, U.</au><au>Blumberg, A. F.</au><au>MacManus, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flood hazard assessment from storm tides, rain and sea level rise for a tidal river estuary</atitle><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Nat Hazards</stitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>729</spage><epage>757</epage><pages>729-757</pages><issn>0921-030X</issn><eissn>1573-0840</eissn><abstract>Cities and towns along the tidal Hudson River are highly vulnerable to flooding through the combination of storm tides and high streamflows, compounded by sea level rise. Here a three-dimensional hydrodynamic model, validated by comparing peak water levels for 76 historical storms, is applied in a probabilistic flood hazard assessment. In simulations, the model merges streamflows and storm tides from tropical cyclones (TCs), offshore extratropical cyclones (ETCs) and inland “wet extratropical” cyclones (WETCs). The climatology of possible ETC and WETC storm events is represented by historical events (1931–2013), and simulations include gauged streamflows and inferred ungauged streamflows (based on watershed area) for the Hudson River and its tributaries. The TC climatology is created using a stochastic statistical model to represent a wider range of storms than is contained in the historical record. TC streamflow hydrographs are simulated for tributaries spaced along the Hudson, modeled as a function of TC attributes (storm track, sea surface temperature, maximum wind speed) using a statistical Bayesian approach. Results show WETCs are important to flood risk in the upper tidal river (e.g., Albany, New York), ETCs are important in the estuary (e.g., New York City) and lower tidal river, and TCs are important at all locations due to their potential for both high surge and extreme rainfall. The raising of floods by sea level rise is shown to be reduced by ~ 30–60% at Albany due to the dominance of streamflow for flood risk. This can be explained with simple channel flow dynamics, in which increased depth throughout the river reduces frictional resistance, thereby reducing the water level slope and the upriver water level.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11069-018-3251-x</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3708-5661</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-030X
ispartof Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2020-06, Vol.102 (2), p.729-757
issn 0921-030X
1573-0840
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2015566162
source Springer Link
subjects Bayesian analysis
Channel flow
Civil Engineering
Climate
Climatology
Computer simulation
Cyclones
Dynamics
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Environmental Management
Environmental risk
Estuaries
Estuarine dynamics
Extratropical cyclones
Extreme weather
Flood hazards
Flood insurance
Flood risk
Flooding
Floods
Friction resistance
Geophysics/Geodesy
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Hazard assessment
Hurricanes
Hydrodynamic models
Hydrodynamics
Hydrogeology
Mathematical models
Natural Hazards
Offshore
Original Paper
Probability theory
Rain
Rainfall
Rivers
Sea level
Sea level rise
Sea surface
Sea surface temperature
Statistical analysis
Stochasticity
Storm surges
Storm tides
Storms
Stream discharge
Stream flow
Surface temperature
Three dimensional models
Tidal rivers
Tides
Tributaries
Tropical cyclones
Water depth
Water levels
Water resistance
Watersheds
Wind speed
title Flood hazard assessment from storm tides, rain and sea level rise for a tidal river estuary
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T12%3A28%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flood%20hazard%20assessment%20from%20storm%20tides,%20rain%20and%20sea%20level%20rise%20for%20a%20tidal%20river%20estuary&rft.jtitle=Natural%20hazards%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Orton,%20P.%20M.&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=729&rft.epage=757&rft.pages=729-757&rft.issn=0921-030X&rft.eissn=1573-0840&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11069-018-3251-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2015566162%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-3e6108ab23b0e548eacc000ba35d1c7ceb720662fbbcb4e9286c5040adc5122f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2015566162&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true