Loading…

Multi-market demand response using economic model predictive control of space heating in residential buildings

•Day-ahead market-based optimization for planning load shifting on a daily basis.•Intraday offers are utilized to address more immediate balancing issues in parallel.•Combined day-ahead and intraday trading increased end-user savings by 46%–94%.•Average intraday trading of 12.7kWh/m2 in low-energy e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy and buildings 2017-09, Vol.150, p.253-261
Main Authors: Hedegaard, Rasmus Elbæk, Pedersen, Theis Heidmann, Petersen, Steffen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Day-ahead market-based optimization for planning load shifting on a daily basis.•Intraday offers are utilized to address more immediate balancing issues in parallel.•Combined day-ahead and intraday trading increased end-user savings by 46%–94%.•Average intraday trading of 12.7kWh/m2 in low-energy efficiency apartments. Several studies have evaluated the potential for residential buildings participating in demand response programs based on the day-ahead electricity market prices. However, little is known about the benefits of residential buildings providing demand response by engaging in trading on the intraday market. This paper presents a simulation-based study of the performance of an economic model predictive control scheme used to enable demand response through parallel utilization of day-ahead market prices and intraday market trading. The performance of the control scheme was evaluated by simulating ten apartments in a residential building located in Denmark through a heating season (four months) using historical market data. The results showed that the addition of intraday trading to the more conventional day-ahead market price-based control problem increased the total cost savings from 2.9% to 5.6% in the existing buildings, and 13%–19% in retrofitted buildings with higher energy-efficiency. In the existing building the proposed control scheme traded on average 12.7kWh/m2 on the intraday market throughout the simulation corresponding to 21% of the reference consumption. For a retrofitted building the traded volume was 9.6kWh/m2 which corresponds to 52% of the reference consumption. These results suggest that the benefits of considering intraday market trading as a demand response incentive mechanism apply to a wide range of buildings.
ISSN:0378-7788
1872-6178
DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.05.059