INSTITUTIONAL EVILS, CULPABLE COMPLICITY, AND DUTIES TO ENGAGE IN MORAL REPAIR

Apology is arguably the central act of the reparative work required after wrongdoing. The analysis by Claudia Card (1940–2015) of complicity in collectively perpetrated evils moves one to ask whether apology ought to be requested of persons culpably complicit in institutional evils. To better apprec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Metaphilosophy 2017-04, Vol.48 (3), p.203-226
Main Authors: PECK, ELIANA, FEDER, ELLEN K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
apology
blame
Claudia Card
complicity
evils
intersex
moral repair
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Apology is arguably the central act of the reparative work required after wrongdoing. The analysis by Claudia Card (1940–2015) of complicity in collectively perpetrated evils moves one to ask whether apology ought to be requested of persons culpably complicit in institutional evils. To better appreciate the benefits of and barriers to apologies offered by culpably complicit wrongdoers, this article examines doctors' complicity in a practice that meets Card's definition of an evil, namely, the non-medically necessary, nonconsensual "normalizing" interventions performed on babies born with intersex anatomies. It argues that in this instance the complicity of doctors is culpable on Card's terms, and that their culpable complicity grounds rightful demands for them to apologize.
ISSN:0026-1068
1467-9973
DOI:10.1111/meta.12238