Physiological responses to drought stress in wild relatives of wheat: implications for wheat improvement

Wild progenitors of common wheat are a potential source of tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. We conducted a glasshouse pot experiment to study genotypic differences in response to drought stress in a collection of 180 accessions of Aegilops and Triticum along with one tolerant and one sensit...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Acta physiologiae plantarum 2017-04, Vol.39 (4), p.1-16, Article 106
Main Authors:	Pour-Aboughadareh, Alireza, Ahmadi, Jafar, Mehrabi, Ali Ashraf, Etminan, Alireza, Moghaddam, Mohammad, Siddique, Kadambot H. M.
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Abiotic factors Aegilops Agriculture Biomedical and Life Sciences Biotic factors Chlorophyll Conductance Drought Environmental stress Fluorescence Genomes Genotypes Immunological tolerance Life Sciences Moisture content Original Article Parameter sensitivity Photosynthesis Physiological responses Physiology Plant Anatomy/Development Plant Biochemistry Plant Genetics and Genomics Plant Pathology Plant Physiology Principal components analysis Quantum efficiency Resistance Stem cells Stomata Stresses Triticum Water content Wheat
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Wild progenitors of common wheat are a potential source of tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. We conducted a glasshouse pot experiment to study genotypic differences in response to drought stress in a collection of 180 accessions of Aegilops and Triticum along with one tolerant and one sensitive control variety. Several physiological traits and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were evaluated. Our findings indicated that drought significantly reduced shoot fresh (59.45%) and dry (50.83%) weights, stomatal conductance (41.52%) and maximum photosynthetic capacity (41.06%), but increased initial fluorescence (28.10%). Drought stress also decreased the chlorophyll content, relative water content and maximum quantum efficiency by 14.90, 12.13 and 11.42%, respectively. Principal component analysis of the 182 individuals identified three components that explained 57.61 and 61.68% of the total variation in physiological and photosynthetic traits under control and stress conditions, respectively. When grouped into the 12 species tested, the three top components explained 78.22% of the total variation under drought. The means comparison, stress tolerance index and biplot analysis identified five accessions with superior tolerance to drought. Remarkably, four species of wild relatives— Ae. cylindrica (DC genome), Ae. crassa (DM genome), Ae. caudata (C genome) and T. urartu (A u genome)—responded well to drought stress with a lower percentage decline for most traits and high values for the first two components. The potential of these species offers further opportunities for analysis at the molecular and cellular levels to confront with drought stress through a physiological mechanism.
ISSN:	0137-5881 1861-1664