The benefits of specific risk-factor disclosures
Practitioners have long criticized risk-factor disclosures in the 10-K as generic and boilerplate. In response, regulators emphasize the importance of being specific. By using a computing algorithm, this paper establishes a new measure ( Specificity ) to quantify the level of specificity of firms’ q...
Saved in:
Published in: | Review of accounting studies 2016-12, Vol.21 (4), p.1005-1045 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Practitioners have long criticized risk-factor disclosures in the 10-K as generic and boilerplate. In response, regulators emphasize the importance of being specific. By using a computing algorithm, this paper establishes a new measure (
Specificity
) to quantify the level of specificity of firms’ qualitative risk-factor disclosures. We first examine determinants of variations in
Specificity
, and document that firms with high proprietary costs provide less specific risk-factor disclosures. More importantly, we find that, controlling for numerous determinants, the market reaction to the 10-K filing is positively and significantly associated with
Specificity
. In addition, our results suggest that analysts are better able to assess fundamental risk when firms’ risk-factor disclosures are more specific. Together, these findings suggest that more specific risk-factor disclosures benefit users of financial statements. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1380-6653 1573-7136 |