Review of Basic Sciences for Ophthalmology

Similar to the anatomy chapter, the optics chapter is concise and clear, but falls well below the level of detail required for Part 1 and trainees should still read Elkington et al. 3 So while it cannot quite live up to the back cover claims of being 'the only resource you need,' because s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps 2014, Vol.160 (1), p.76-76
Main Author: Blanch, Richard James
Format: Review
Language:English
Subjects:
Anatomy & physiology
Medical personnel
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Similar to the anatomy chapter, the optics chapter is concise and clear, but falls well below the level of detail required for Part 1 and trainees should still read Elkington et al. 3 So while it cannot quite live up to the back cover claims of being 'the only resource you need,' because separate anatomy and optics books are still required, the main question is, can it replace Forrester et al?
ISSN:0035-8665
2633-3767
2052-0468
2633-3775
DOI:10.1136/jramc-2013-000166