Research method in education: The frame by which the picture hangs

Research should be legitimized and clarified by the philosophical frame by which it metaphorically hangs. Such clarity is important in so far as it helps to provide a foundation for guiding researchers' evaluations of the quality of their research findings. This article focuses on certain philo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of multiple research approaches 2012-12, Vol.6 (3), p.220-232
Main Authors: Walt, Johannes L Van Der, Potgieter, Ferdinand J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Education
Epistemology
integrated personality
nomothetic
Ontology
Personality
Personality traits
Positivism
Research methodology
Researchers
spirituality
Studies
teleological
Teleology
transcendental
Transcendentalism
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Research should be legitimized and clarified by the philosophical frame by which it metaphorically hangs. Such clarity is important in so far as it helps to provide a foundation for guiding researchers' evaluations of the quality of their research findings. This article focuses on certain philosophical pre-conditions and justifications, that is, the underlying, pre-theoretical or pre-scientific provisos/specifications/provisions for a researcher's thinking and hence for his or her decisions about which methodology to follow and methods to apply when researching a problem. In order to achieve this aim, the authors discuss the four 'sides' or 'panels' of the philosophical frame by which a researcher's research method, in general, tends to hang, figuratively speaking: namely, (a) integrated personality orientation; (b) transcendental orientation; (c) teleological orientation; and (d) nomothetic orientation. Overlooking this 'frame by which a researcher's methodological picture hangs' might have serious repercussions for how one conducts research.
ISSN:1834-0806
1834-0814
DOI:10.5172/mra.2012.6.3.220