Loading…

Colon inflammatory index as a useful prognostic marker after R0 resection in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis

Although R0 resection for colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) is a promising treatment with improved prognosis, the recurrence rate is still high. No prognostic markers have been reported after resection of CRLM. In this study, we investigated the association between inflammation-based score a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2022-10, Vol.17 (10), p.e0273167-e0273167
Main Authors: Ishii, Mitsutoshi, Tominaga, Tetsuro, Nonaka, Takashi, Oyama, Shosaburo, Moriyama, Masaaki, Maruyama, Keizaburo, Sawai, Terumitsu, Nagayasu, Takeshi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Although R0 resection for colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) is a promising treatment with improved prognosis, the recurrence rate is still high. No prognostic markers have been reported after resection of CRLM. In this study, we investigated the association between inflammation-based score and prognosis after R0 resection in patients with CRLM. We retrospectively investigated 90 patients who underwent R0 resection for CRLM between 2008 and 2018. We calculated colon inflammatory index (CII) (CII0, low risk; CII1, intermediate risk; and CII2, high risk), modified Glasgow prognostic score, prognostic nutritional index, and CRP-to-albumin ratio; and retrospectively assessed the relationship between these scores, the clinicopathological features, and prognosis. The median follow-up period was 44 months (range, 2-101 months). Five-year relapse-free survival (RFS) (CII2; 12.5%, CII1; 14.5%, CII0; 42.9%) and 5-year overall survival (OS) (CII2; 32.4%, CII1; 25.4%, CII0; 57.7%) were significantly lower in the high CII groups (CII1-2) compared with the low CII group (CII0) (p = 0.021 and p = 0.006, respectively). CEA level was significantly higher in the high CII group than the low CII group (12.4 vs 7.3, p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis showed CII score as an independent predictor of RFS (hazard ratio 2.128, 95%CI 1.147-3.430, p = 0.015) and OS (hazard ratio 2.639, 95%CI 1.331-5.323, p = 0.005). CII shows promise as a prognostic marker after R0 liver resection in patients with CRLM.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0273167