Effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing teaching: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis

Several teaching methods have been used in clinical nursing teaching to increase quality and efficiency, but disagreements over their effects persist. This study will evaluate the effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing on nursing students' knowledge, skill scores, learning satisfa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2022-08, Vol.17 (8), p.e0273693-e0273693
Main Authors: Ni, Jinhui, Wu, Pei, Huang, Xinlin, Zhang, Fangfang, You, Ze, Chang, Qiaoling, Liao, Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bias
Biology and Life Sciences
Clinical medicine
Clinical nursing
Clinical trials
Consistency tests
COVID-19
Education
Educational aspects
Ethics
Health risks
Homogeneity
Independent study
Intervention
Knowledge
Medical care
Medicine and Health Sciences
Meta-analysis
Methods
Nurses
Nursing
Nursing education
Patients
People and Places
Physical Sciences
Problem based learning
Quality management
Research and Analysis Methods
Research ethics
Science and technology
Sensitivity analysis
Social Sciences
Statistical analysis
Students
Study Protocol
Systematic review
Teaching methods
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Several teaching methods have been used in clinical nursing teaching to increase quality and efficiency, but disagreements over their effects persist. This study will evaluate the effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing on nursing students' knowledge, skill scores, learning satisfaction, and patients' satisfaction. We will conduct searches in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), China Biological literature database (CBM), Wanfang Database, and China Science and Technology Journal Database (CSTJ) up to April 2022. Relevant randomized controlled trials meeting the eligibility criteria will be included. And the study selection and data extraction will be independently screened for eligibility by two authors. The quality of evidence will be evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) will be conducted using Rev Man, Stata, and R software. Statistical analyses including homogeneity tests, sensitivity analysis, transitivity tests, consistency tests, and publication bias will be completed.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0273693