Loading…

Current status of proton pump inhibitor use in Japanese elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: A subanalysis of the ANAFIE Registry

The real-world status of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving antithrombotic treatment is largely unknown. The All Nippon AF In the Elderly (ANAFIE) Registry, a prospective, multicenter, observational study, aimed to determine treatment patterns, risk f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2020-11, Vol.15 (11), p.e0240859
Main Authors: Mizokami, Yuji, Yamamoto, Takatsugu, Atarashi, Hirotsugu, Yamashita, Takeshi, Akao, Masaharu, Ikeda, Takanori, Koretsune, Yukihiro, Okumura, Ken, Shimizu, Wataru, Tsutsui, Hiroyuki, Toyoda, Kazunori, Hirayama, Atsushi, Yasaka, Masahiro, Yamaguchi, Takenori, Teramukai, Satoshi, Kimura, Tetsuya, Kaburagi, Jumpei, Takita, Atsushi, Inoue, Hiroshi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The real-world status of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving antithrombotic treatment is largely unknown. The All Nippon AF In the Elderly (ANAFIE) Registry, a prospective, multicenter, observational study, aimed to determine treatment patterns, risk factors, and outcomes among elderly (aged ≥75 years) Japanese non-valvular AF (NVAF) patients in the real-world clinical setting. The present subanalysis of the ANAFIE Registry determined the PPI prescription status of 32,490 elderly Japanese NVAF patients. Patients were stratified by PPI use (PPI+) or no PPI use (PPI-). Risk scores for stroke (CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc) and bleeding (HAS-BLED), anticoagulant use, time in therapeutic range (TTR) for warfarin, and anticoagulant/antiplatelet combination use were evaluated. PPIs were used in 11,981 (36.9%) patients. Compared with the PPI- group, the PPI+ group included a greater proportion of female patients (45.2% vs 41.3%; P
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0240859