Pathways to conspiracy: The social and linguistic precursors of involvement in Reddit's conspiracy theory forum

Many individuals who engage with conspiracy theories come to do so through a combination of individual and social factors. The interaction between these factors is challenging to study using traditional experimental designs. Reddit.com is a large connected set of online discussion forums, including...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	PloS one 2019-11, Vol.14 (11), p.e0225098-e0225098
Main Authors:	Klein, Colin, Clutton, Peter, Dunn, Adam G
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Analysis Biology and Life Sciences Case-Control Studies Computer and Information Sciences Conspiracy Conspiracy theories Human acts Human behavior Humans Informatics Klein, Peter Linguistics Medical research Models, Theoretical Philosophy Researchers Social aspects Social behavior Social factors Social networks Social Sciences
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Many individuals who engage with conspiracy theories come to do so through a combination of individual and social factors. The interaction between these factors is challenging to study using traditional experimental designs. Reddit.com is a large connected set of online discussion forums, including one (r/conspiracy) devoted to wide-ranging discussion of conspiracy theories. The availability of large datasets of user comments from Reddit give a unique opportunity to observe human behavior in social spaces and at scale. Using a retrospective case control study design, we analyzed how Reddit users who would go on to engage with a conspiracy-related forum differed from other users in the language they use, differences in the social environments where they posted, and potential interactions between the two factors. Together, the analyses provide evidence for self-selection into communities with a shared set of interests which can feed into a conspiratorial world-view, and that these differences are detectable relative to controls even before users begin to post in r/conspiracy. We also suggest that survey-based and experimental studies may benefit from differentiating between passive private endorsement by individuals and active engagement with conspiracy theories in social spaces.
ISSN:	1932-6203 1932-6203