Loading…

The Effect of Realtime Monitoring on Dose Exposure to Staff Within an Interventional Radiology Setting

Purpose The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new device providing real-time monitoring on radiation exposure during fluoroscopy procedures intending to reduce radiation in an interventional radiology setting. Materials and Methods In one interventional suite, a new system providing a real-time...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cardiovascular and interventional radiology 2015-10, Vol.38 (5), p.1105-1111
Main Authors: Baumann, Frederic, Katzen, Barry T., Carelsen, Bart, Diehm, Nicolas, Benenati, James F., Peña, Constantino S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new device providing real-time monitoring on radiation exposure during fluoroscopy procedures intending to reduce radiation in an interventional radiology setting. Materials and Methods In one interventional suite, a new system providing a real-time radiation dose display and five individual wireless dosimeters were installed. The five dosimeters were worn by the attending, fellow, nurse, technician, and anesthesiologist for every procedure taking place in that suite. During the first 6-week interval the dose display was off (closed phase) and activated thereafter, for a 6-week learning phase (learning phase) and a 10-week open phase (open phase). During these phases, the staff dose and the individual dose for each procedure were recorded from the wireless dosimeter and correlated with the fluoroscopy time. Further subanalysis for dose exposure included diagnostic versus interventional as well as short (10 min) procedures. Results A total of 252 procedures were performed ( n  = 88 closed phase, n  = 50 learning phase, n  = 114 open phase). The overall mean staff dose per fluoroscopic minute was 42.79 versus 19.81 µSv/min ( p  
ISSN:0174-1551
1432-086X
DOI:10.1007/s00270-015-1075-6