Loading…

Using MCDA and GIS for hazardous waste landfill siting considering land scarcity for waste disposal

[Display omitted] •Wasting land for the siting of hazardous waste landfills must be avoided.•The siting procedure is based on a land use map of potentially suitable areas.•All the waste facilities of the management system are simultaneously considered.•A case study is developed considering two multi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Waste management (Elmsford) 2014-11, Vol.34 (11), p.2225-2238
Main Authors: Feo, Giovanni De, Gisi, Sabino De
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:[Display omitted] •Wasting land for the siting of hazardous waste landfills must be avoided.•The siting procedure is based on a land use map of potentially suitable areas.•All the waste facilities of the management system are simultaneously considered.•A case study is developed considering two multi-criteria techniques.•An innovative criteria weighting tool (PSW) is used in combination with the AHP. The main aim of this study was to develop a procedure that minimizes the wasting of space for the siting of hazardous waste landfills as part of a solid waste management system. We wanted to tackle the shortage of land for waste disposal that is a serious and growing problem in most large urban regions. The procedure combines a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach with a geographical information system (GIS). The GIS was utilised to obtain an initial screening in order to eliminate unsuitable areas, whereas the MCDA was developed to select the most suitable sites. The novelty of the proposed siting procedure is the introduction of a new screening phase before the macro-siting step aimed at producing a “land use map of potentially suitable areas” for the siting of solid waste facilities which simultaneously takes into consideration all plant types. The issue of obtaining sites evaluations of a specific facility was coupled with the issue of not wasting land appropriate to facilitate other types of waste management options. In the developed case study, the use of an innovative criteria weighting tool (the “Priority Scale”) in combination with the Analytic Hierarchy Process was useful to easier define the priorities of the evaluation criteria in comparison with other classic methods such as the Paired Comparison Technique in combination with the Simple Additive Weighting method.
ISSN:0956-053X
1879-2456
DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.05.028