Loading…

Chemical bonding in EuTGe (T = Ni, Pd, Pt) and physical properties of EuPdGe

EuPdGe was prepared from the elements by reaction in a sealed tantalum tube in a high-frequency furnace. Magnetic susceptibility measurements show Curie-Weiss behavior above 60 K with an experimental magnetic moment of 8.0(1)μB/Eu indicating divalent europium. At low external fields antiferromagneti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of solid state chemistry 2007-02, Vol.180 (2), p.533-540
Main Authors: ROCQUEFELTE, Xavier, GAUTIER, Régis, HALET, Jean-Francois, MÜLLMANN, Ralf, ROSENHAHN, Carsten, MOSEL, Bernd D, KOTZYBA, Gunter, POTTGEN, Rainer
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:EuPdGe was prepared from the elements by reaction in a sealed tantalum tube in a high-frequency furnace. Magnetic susceptibility measurements show Curie-Weiss behavior above 60 K with an experimental magnetic moment of 8.0(1)μB/Eu indicating divalent europium. At low external fields antiferromagnetic ordering is observed at TN=8.5(5) K. Magnetization measurements indicate a metamagnetic transition at a critical field of 1.5(2) T and a saturation magnetization of 6.4(1)μB/Eu at 5 K and 5.5 T. EuPdGe is a metallic conductor with a room-temperature value of 5000±500 μΩ cm for the specific resistivity. 151Eu Mössbauer spectroscopic experiments show a single europium site with an isomer shift of δ=−9.7(1) mm/s at 78 K. At 4.2 K full magnetic hyperfine field splitting with a hyperfine field of B=20.7(5) T is observed. Density functional calculations show the similarity of the electronic structures of EuPdGe and EuPtGe. T-Ge interactions (T=Pd, Pt) exist in both compounds. An ionic formula splitting Eu2+T0Ge2− seems more appropriate than Eu2+T2+Ge4− accounting for the bonding in both compounds. Geometry optimizations of EuTGe (T=Ni, Pt, Pd) show weak energy differences between the two structural types.
ISSN:0022-4596
1095-726X
DOI:10.1016/j.jssc.2006.11.013