Techno-economic analysis of ethanol production from sugarcane bagasse using a Liquefaction plus Simultaneous Saccharification and co-Fermentation process

[Display omitted] •A simplified (L+SScF) process with phosphoric acid was modelled using Aspen.•A $10mil savings in capital cost was achieved by using phosphoric acid.•Capital investment ranged from $169 to $197mil for various scenarios.•Ethanol production cost varied between 50 and 63 cents per lit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bioresource technology 2016-05, Vol.208 (C), p.42-48
Main Authors: Gubicza, Krisztina, Nieves, Ismael U., Sagues, William J., Barta, Zsolt, Shanmugam, K.T., Ingram, Lonnie O.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biotechnology - economics
Biotechnology - methods
Cellulose - chemistry
Ethanol
Ethanol - economics
Ethanol - metabolism
Fermentation
Hemicellulose
Investments
L + SScF
Lignocellulose
Models, Economic
Models, Theoretical
Phosphoric Acids - chemistry
Saccharum - chemistry
Xylose
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:[Display omitted] •A simplified (L+SScF) process with phosphoric acid was modelled using Aspen.•A $10mil savings in capital cost was achieved by using phosphoric acid.•Capital investment ranged from $169 to $197mil for various scenarios.•Ethanol production cost varied between 50 and 63 cents per liter.•Overall ethanol yield had the biggest impact on production cost. A techno-economic analysis was conducted for a simplified lignocellulosic ethanol production process developed and proven by the University of Florida at laboratory, pilot, and demonstration scales. Data obtained from all three scales of development were used with Aspen Plus to create models for an experimentally-proven base-case and 5 hypothetical scenarios. The model input parameters that differed among the hypothetical scenarios were fermentation time, enzyme loading, enzymatic conversion, solids loading, and overall process yield. The minimum ethanol selling price (MESP) varied between 50.38 and 62.72US cents/L. The feedstock and the capital cost were the main contributors to the production cost, comprising between 23–28% and 40–49% of the MESP, respectively. A sensitivity analysis showed that overall ethanol yield had the greatest effect on the MESP. These findings suggest that future efforts to increase the economic feasibility of a cellulosic ethanol process should focus on optimization for highest ethanol yield.
ISSN:0960-8524
1873-2976
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.093