Scientific identity of "top" research journals in the broader discipline of marketing
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to describe the "scientific identity" of the "top" research journals in the broader discipline of marketing by examining the methodological approaches and the geographical affiliations of authors published in selected journals.Design methodo...
Saved in:
| Published in: | European business review 2008-08, Vol.20 (5), p.384-400 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | eng |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to describe the "scientific identity" of the "top" research journals in the broader discipline of marketing by examining the methodological approaches and the geographical affiliations of authors published in selected journals.Design methodology approach - A sample of "top" research journals in marketing is selected on the basis of expert opinion and journal ranking lists. The selection includes the Journal of Consumer Research (JCR), Journal of Marketing (JM), Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), Journal of Retailing (JR), Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS); and Marketing Science (MS).Findings - The "scientific identities" of JCR, JM, JMR, JR, JAMS and MS are revealed as being built on quantitative research designs and the North American paradigm of research values. In fact, all journals are US-based. None was found to be based on a mix of empirical research designs. The selected research journals were found to be narrowly focused, and the lack of variety of "scientific identities" among the journals studied here is discomfiting for the ongoing scientific knowledge building and theory generation in marketing.Research limitations implications - Further studies of the "scientific identity" of individual research journals are desirable in other sub-disciplines of marketing. A series of questions have been raised that the authors argue are worthy of further attention and debate in the world-wide research community.Practical implications - Researchers will benefit from insights into the "scientific identities" of the "top" research journals in the broader discipline of marketing. In particular, researchers can note the particular feature of dogmatic narrowness of research designs that are present in all of these journals.Originality value - The study delivers insights into the publishing requirements of "top" research journals in the broader discipline of marketing. It provides some challenging and discomfiting findings. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0955-534X 1758-7107 |