An Insight Into the Internal Consistency of MODIS Global Leaf Area Index Products

The evaluation and validation of climate data records (CDRs) derived from remote sensing play crucial roles in their generation and applications. However, many existing evaluation schemes rely on simplistic, spatiotemporally invariant metrics to assess the products' overall quality, which leads...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing 2024, Vol.62, p.1-16
Main Authors: Zhang, Xingjian, Yan, Kai, Liu, Jinxiu, Yang, Kai, Pu, Jiabin, Yan, Guangjian, Heiskanen, Janne, Zhu, Peng, Knyazikhin, Yuri, Myneni, Ranga B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Classification algorithms
Climate data record (CDR)
internal consistency
Land surface
leaf area index (LAI)
Meteorology
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)
MODIS
product evaluation
Spatial resolution
Uncertainty
Vegetation mapping
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The evaluation and validation of climate data records (CDRs) derived from remote sensing play crucial roles in their generation and applications. However, many existing evaluation schemes rely on simplistic, spatiotemporally invariant metrics to assess the products' overall quality, which leads to the long-term neglect of intra-product inconsistencies stemming from observation conditions, algorithmic differences, and sensor degradation. Leaf area index (LAI) is a crucial variable for land surface and climate modeling, and the intra-product inconsistency will increase the uncertainty in related studies. In order to improve the evaluation scheme of LAI products and ensure their reliability, we propose a new perspective for evaluating global LAI time series. In this study, we utilize the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) C6.1 LAI product as an example to infer its internal consistency through cross-comparisons among different sensors and spatiotemporal correlations between two adjacent years of the product. We found that compared to the main algorithm, the backup algorithm of the MODIS LAI product tends to underestimate the retrieval results. This inconsistency is particularly pronounced in tropical regions but relatively minor in most other areas. Additionally, these inconsistencies can lead to unusual fluctuations in the LAI time series, impacting the magnitude and direction of short-term vegetation monitoring. However, the influence on long-term trend analyses is negligible. Therefore, special attention should be given to the intra-product consistency in certain studies. In conclusion, the evaluation perspective proposed in this study is of great significance for improving the LAI evaluation scheme and ensuring the use and improvement of remote sensing products.
ISSN:0196-2892
1558-0644
DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2024.3434366