A re-evaluation of mixed-mode cohesive zone modeling based on strength concepts instead of traction laws

New methods for implementing cohesive zones in computational mechanics were derived by re-interpreting cohesive-zone “traction laws” as “strength models” and using concepts from damage mechanics. When applied to pure mode I or mode II loading, this approach is identical to prior methods. But, when a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Engineering fracture mechanics 2021-05, Vol.248, p.107704, Article 107704
Main Authors: Nairn, John A., Aimene, Yamina E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cohesion
Cohesive zones
Computational mechanics
Computer Science
Crack propagation
Crack tips
Damage mechanics
Engineering Sciences
Material point method
Mixed-mode fracture
Precracking
Process zones
Traction
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:New methods for implementing cohesive zones in computational mechanics were derived by re-interpreting cohesive-zone “traction laws” as “strength models” and using concepts from damage mechanics. When applied to pure mode I or mode II loading, this approach is identical to prior methods. But, when applied to mixed-mode loading, it defines a new approach called strength cohesive zone modeling (or “strength CZM”). Compared to previous methods, strength CZM provides improved modeling for problems with changing mode mixity, allows independent selection of normal and tangential strength models, and reveals limitations in any method based on effective displacements. New modeling shows that mode mixity, which changes during crack growth, depends on cohesive zone properties and on which end of the cohesive process zone is interpreted as the crack tip. These observations suggest many prior experimental results need reanalysis. By considering a range of independent strength models, strength CZM predicts that all GI-GII failure envelopes are convex. Precracking steps recommended in delamination testing protocols are considered. Strength CZM can realistically model precracking while prior methods generate unrealistic predictions. •Strength cohesive zone modeling is an improved approach for mixed-mode failures.•Normal and tangential cohesive laws can be independently selected.•This analysis reveals limitations in any method that uses effective displacements.•New modeling predicts all GI-GII failure envelopes are convex.•Because mode mixity depends on cohesive zone laws, many experiments need reanalysis.
ISSN:0013-7944
1873-7315
DOI:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107704