Loading…
Similar 5‐year HCC occurrence in Tenofovir‐ and Entecavir‐treated HBV chronic infection in the French AFEF/ANRS CO22 Hepather cohort
Summary Background Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection results in a high risk of cirrhosis and its complications, cirrhosis decompensation (DC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver transplantation (LT), death or any of these outcomes (composite endpoint [CE]). Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs)...
Saved in:
Published in: | Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics (Suppl) 2021-03, Vol.53 (5), p.616-629 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Summary
Background
Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection results in a high risk of cirrhosis and its complications, cirrhosis decompensation (DC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver transplantation (LT), death or any of these outcomes (composite endpoint [CE]). Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) such as tenofovir or entecavir are associated with a reduction in these complications.
Aim
To compare the impact of tenofovir and entecavir on these outcomes in patients treated for HBV infection and included in the prospective Hepather cohort.
Methods
All patients with HBV infection who had received tenofovir or entecavir for more than 6 months at or after entry in the ANRS CO22 cohort were selected. Patients with HDV and HCV co‐infection or prior liver event were excluded. Incidence rates of events were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPW).
Results
The cohort included 1800 patients (986 tenofovir and 814 entecavir). Median follow‐up was 4.2 years. The incidences of HCC, DC, LT, ACD, LRD and CE were not different between tenofovir‐ (1.8 (0.9; 3.2), 0.6 (0.2; 1.6), 0.2 (0.0; 0.8), 1.7 (0.8; 3.0), 0.8 (0.2, 1.8) and 4.1 (3.0; 5.4) per 1000 person‐years) and entecavir‐treated patients (1.6 (0.7; 3.0), 0.7 (0.2; 1.8), 0.2 (0.0; 1.0), 3.0 (1.7, 4.8), 0.5 (0.1; 1.5) and 5.0 (3.3; 7.2)) per 1000 person‐years, respectively.
Conclusion
The risk of liver‐related events or death was not different between tenofovir‐ and entecavir‐treated patients in this large prospective cohort of predominantly non‐cirrhotic French patients.
Trial registration number: NCT019553458. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0269-2813 0953-0673 1365-2036 |
DOI: | 10.1111/apt.16197 |