Loading…

Initial rhythm control with cryoballoon ablation vs drug therapy: Impact on quality of life and symptoms

Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) as a first-line rhythm control strategy is superior to antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) for preventing atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence; the impact of first-line CBA on quality of life (QoL) and symptoms has not been well characterized. Patients aged 18 to 75 with symptomati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American heart journal 2021-12, Vol.242, p.103-114
Main Authors: Pavlovic, Nikola, Chierchia, Gian-Battista, Velagic, Vedran, Hermida, Jean Sylvain, Healey, Stewart, Arena, Giuseppe, Badenco, Nicolas, Meyer, Christian, Chen, Jian, Iacopino, Saverio, Anselme, Frédéric, Dekker, Lukas, Scazzuso, Fernando, Packer, Douglas L, de Asmundis, Carlo, Pitschner, Heinz-Friedrich, Piazza, Fabio Di, Kaplon, Rachelle E, Kuniss, Malte
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) as a first-line rhythm control strategy is superior to antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) for preventing atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence; the impact of first-line CBA on quality of life (QoL) and symptoms has not been well characterized. Patients aged 18 to 75 with symptomatic paroxysmal AF naïve to rhythm control therapy were randomized (1:1) to CBA (Arctic Front Advance, Medtronic) or AAD (Class I or III). Symptoms and QoL were assessed at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months using the EHRA classification and Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-Life (AFEQT) and SF-36v2 questionnaires. Symptomatic palpitations were evaluated via patient diary. Overall, 107 patients were randomized to CBA and 111 to AAD; crossovers occurred in 9%. Larger improvements in the AFEQT summary, subscale and treatment satisfaction scores were observed at 12 months with CBA vs AAD (all P
ISSN:0002-8703
1097-6744
DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2021.08.007