Editor's Choice – Long-term Survival and Risk Analysis in 136 Consecutive Patients With Type B Aortic Dissection Presenting to a Single Centre Over an 11 Year Period

ObjectivesTo evaluate, in patients with acute type B aortic dissection, the results of medical and endovascular treatment in a large single centre experience and to investigate the clinical and imaging features on presentation that relate to poor outcome. MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery 2019-05, Vol.57 (5), p.633-638
Main Authors: Clough, Rachel E, Barillà, David, Delsart, Pascal, Ledieu, Guillaume, Spear, Rafaelle, Crichton, Siobhan, Mounier Vehier, Claire, Peacock, Janet, Sobocinski, Jonathan, Haulon, Stephan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aged
Aneurysm, Dissecting - diagnostic imaging
Aneurysm, Dissecting - drug therapy
Aneurysm, Dissecting - pathology
Aneurysm, Dissecting - surgery
Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - diagnostic imaging
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - drug therapy
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - pathology
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - surgery
Aortic dissection
Computed Tomography Angiography
Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Life Sciences
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications
Progression-Free Survival
Proportional Hazards Models
Retrospective Studies
Risk analysis
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Surgery
Survival
Time Factors
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ObjectivesTo evaluate, in patients with acute type B aortic dissection, the results of medical and endovascular treatment in a large single centre experience and to investigate the clinical and imaging features on presentation that relate to poor outcome. MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected clinical and CT imaging data. Consecutive patients (136) with acute type B aortic dissection were included in the study over an 11 year period. The characteristics of patients receiving endovascular (complicated) or medical treatment (uncomplicated) were compared. Kaplan–Meier estimators were used to estimate cumulative overall survival and survival free of aortic events. Factors associated with overall and aortic event free survival were also explored using Cox proportional hazards models. ResultsThe mean follow up was 51 months (1–132), during which time 33 deaths and 48 aortic events occurred. At one and five years, overall survival was 94.0% and 74.8%, respectively, and freedom from aortic events was 75.6% and 58.7%. There was no difference in all cause survival and aortic event free survival at one and five years between the patients treated endovascularly and those receiving medical treatment alone. Risk analysis for aortic events demonstrated the maximum size of the proximal entry tear, the maximum thoracic aortic diameter, and the thoracic aortic false lumen maximum diameter to have a significant effect on the incidence of aortic events. ConclusionsActive management of patients with type B aortic dissection results in good long-term survival even in the presence of features traditionally associated with adverse outcomes. All patients require close lifetime surveillance as aortic events continue to occur during follow up even after endografting.
ISSN:1078-5884
1532-2165
DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.08.042