Positive and negative interactions jointly determine the structure of Müllerian mimetic communities

Negative and positive ecological interactions have opposite effects on the structure of ecological communities, in particular in terms of ecological similarity among interacting species. In nature, species belonging to the same guild often interact in both negative and positive ways, yet the interpl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oikos 2020-07, Vol.129 (7), p.983-997
Main Authors: Aubier, Thomas G., Elias, Marianne
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
agent-based model
Biological competition
Community ecology
community structure
Competition
Computer simulation
convergence
Dimensions
Ecological distribution
Ecological effects
Ecological niches
Ecology, environment
Empirical analysis
Habitats
Heterogeneity
Life Sciences
Mimicry
mutualism
Niches
resource distribution
Resources
Similarity
Species
Symbiosis
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Negative and positive ecological interactions have opposite effects on the structure of ecological communities, in particular in terms of ecological similarity among interacting species. In nature, species belonging to the same guild often interact in both negative and positive ways, yet the interplay between interactions of different kinds in intraguild community dynamics remains poorly understood. Müllerian mimetic communities are particularly suited for investigating this interplay because positive (mutualistic mimicry) and negative (competition for trophic resource and micro‐habitat) interactions are relatively easy to identify. Empirical research has shown that the combination of mutualistic mimicry and competition does not necessarily drive convergence along all dimensions of the ecological niche, but the determinants of such mixed result are unknown. Here, we analyze the structure of Müllerian mimetic communities simulated with an agent‐based model. We show that mutualistic mimicry favours ecological similarity on dimensions along which similarity favours fine‐scale co‐occurrence. Co‐mimetic species use similar micro‐habitats, but do not necessarily use similar resources. Heterogeneity of resources among micro‐habitats is necessary for ecological similarity on resource use among co‐mimetic species to occur. We therefore highlight the importance of fine‐scale co‐occurrence if we are to understand how positive and negative interactions structure ecological communities.
ISSN:0030-1299
1600-0706
DOI:10.1111/oik.06789