Significance testing testate amoeba water table reconstructions

Transfer functions are valuable tools in palaeoecology, but their output may not always be meaningful. A recently-developed statistical test (‘randomTF’) offers the potential to distinguish among reconstructions which are more likely to be useful, and those less so. We applied this test to a large n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Quaternary science reviews 2016-04, Vol.138, p.131-135
Main Authors: Payne, Richard J., Babeshko, Kirill V., van Bellen, Simon, Blackford, Jeffrey J., Booth, Robert K., Charman, Dan J., Ellershaw, Megan R., Gilbert, Daniel, Hughes, Paul D.M., Jassey, Vincent E.J., Lamentowicz, Łukasz, Lamentowicz, Mariusz, Malysheva, Elena A., Mauquoy, Dmitri, Mazei, Yuri, Mitchell, Edward A.D., Swindles, Graeme T., Tsyganov, Andrey N., Turner, T. Edward, Telford, Richard J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Ecology, environment
Life Sciences
Palaeoecology
Palaeohydrology
Protist
RandomTF
Testate amoeba
Transfer function
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Transfer functions are valuable tools in palaeoecology, but their output may not always be meaningful. A recently-developed statistical test (‘randomTF’) offers the potential to distinguish among reconstructions which are more likely to be useful, and those less so. We applied this test to a large number of reconstructions of peatland water table depth based on testate amoebae. Contrary to our expectations, a substantial majority (25 of 30) of these reconstructions gave non-significant results (P > 0.05). The underlying reasons for this outcome are unclear. We found no significant correlation between randomTF P-value and transfer function performance, the properties of the training set and reconstruction, or measures of transfer function fit. These results give cause for concern but we believe it would be extremely premature to discount the results of non-significant reconstructions. We stress the need for more critical assessment of transfer function output, replication of results and ecologically-informed interpretation of palaeoecological data. •The ‘randomTF’ test offers potential to differentiate amongst palaeoenvironmental reconstructions.•We applied this test to 30 testate amoeba records; most gave non-significant results.•The reasons for this result are unclear and call for further research.
ISSN:0277-3791
1873-457X
DOI:10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.01.030