Loading…
Oriented trees in digraphs
Let f(k) be the smallest integer such that every f(k)-chromatic digraph contains every oriented tree of order k. Burr proved f(k)≤(k−1)2 in general, and he conjectured f(k)=2k−2. Burr also proved that every (8k−7)-chromatic digraph contains every antidirected tree. We improve both of Burr’s bounds....
Saved in:
Published in: | Discrete mathematics 2013-04, Vol.313 (8), p.967-974 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Let f(k) be the smallest integer such that every f(k)-chromatic digraph contains every oriented tree of order k. Burr proved f(k)≤(k−1)2 in general, and he conjectured f(k)=2k−2. Burr also proved that every (8k−7)-chromatic digraph contains every antidirected tree. We improve both of Burr’s bounds. We show that f(k)≤k2/2−k/2+1 and that every antidirected tree of order k is contained in every (5k−9)-chromatic digraph.
We make a conjecture that explains why antidirected trees are easier to handle. It states that if |E(D)|>(k−2)|V(D)|, then the digraph D contains every antidirected tree of order k. This is a common strengthening of both Burr’s conjecture for antidirected trees and the celebrated Erdős-Sós Conjecture. The analogue of our conjecture for general trees is false, no matter what function f(k) is used in place of k−2. We prove our conjecture for antidirected trees of diameter 3 and present some other evidence for it.
Along the way, we show that every acyclic k-chromatic digraph contains every oriented tree of order k and suggest a number of approaches for making further progress on Burr’s conjecture. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0012-365X 1872-681X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.disc.2013.01.011 |