Loading…
A Phase I Open-Label Clinical Trial Evaluating the Therapeutic Vaccine [hVEGF.sub.26-104]/RFASE in Patients with Advanced Solid Malignancies
Background. Targeting vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF) is a well-established anticancer therapy. We designed a first-in-human clinical trial to investigate the safety and immunogenicity of the novel vaccine [hVEGF.sub.26-104]/RFASE. Methods. Patients with advanced solid malignancies with...
Saved in:
Published in: | The oncologist (Dayton, Ohio) Ohio), 2021-02, Vol.26 (2), p.e218 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background. Targeting vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF) is a well-established anticancer therapy. We designed a first-in-human clinical trial to investigate the safety and immunogenicity of the novel vaccine [hVEGF.sub.26-104]/RFASE. Methods. Patients with advanced solid malignancies with no standard treatment options available were eligible for this phase I study with a 3+3 dose-escalation design. On days 0, 14, and 28, patients received intramuscular [hVEGF.sub.26-104], a truncated synthetic three-dimensional (3D)-structured peptide mimic covering the amino acids 26-104 of the human [VEGF.sub.165] isoform, emulsified in the novel adjuvant Raffinose Fatty Acid Sulphate Ester (RFASE), a sulpholipopolysaccharide. Objectives were to determine safety, induction of VEGF-neutralizing antibodies, and the maximum tolerated dose. Blood was sampled to measure VEGF levels and antibody titers. Results. Eighteen of 27 enrolled patients received three immunizations in six different dose-levels up to 1,000 [micro]g [hVEGF.sub.26-104] and 40 mg RFASE. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. Although in four patients an antibody titer against [hVEGF.sub.26-104] was induced (highest titer: 2.77 [sup.10]log), neither a reduction in VEGF levels nor neutralizing antibodies against native [VEGF.sub.165] were detected. Conclusion. Despite having an attractive safety profile, [hVEGF.sub.26-104]/RFASE was not able to elicit seroconversions against native [VEGF.sub.165] and, consequently, did not decrease circulating VEGF levels. Deficient RFASE adjuvant activity, as well as dominant immunoreactivity toward neoepitopes, may have impeded [hVEGF.sub.26-104]/RFASE's efficacy in humans. The Oncologist 2021;26:e218-e229 Key Words. Angiogenesis inhibitors * Peptite vaccine * Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1083-7159 1549-490X |
DOI: | 10.1002/onco.13576 |