Testing of Reliability and Validity of the Peninsula Health Falls Risk Assessment Tool in Acute Care: A Cross-Sectional Study

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Peninsula Health Fall Risk Assessment Tool (PHFRAT) in acute care in various medical specialties. The assessment has not been previously studied in acute care. Methods: The cross-sectional study was conducted in a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Risk management and healthcare policy 2021-11, Vol.14, p.4685
Main Authors: Heikkila, Anniina, Lehtonen, Lasse, Haukka, Jari, Havulinna, Satu, Junttila, Kristiina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Health aspects
Medical advice systems
Psychiatric services
Risk assessment
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Peninsula Health Fall Risk Assessment Tool (PHFRAT) in acute care in various medical specialties. The assessment has not been previously studied in acute care. Methods: The cross-sectional study was conducted in a large acute care hospital system. The retrospective medical data were used to explore the validity of the PHFRAT. The data consisted of all adult inpatients ([greater than or equal to] 18 age) evaluated by the PHFRAT during 2014-2016 (n = 22,700). The Poisson regression, logistic regression, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the ROC curve were evaluated. The data for the reliability study were collected in 2016 in twelve units by evaluating the patients (n = 359) twice using the PHFRAT. The prospective data were analyzed using Fleiss' Kappa, and the content validity index was also counted. Results: In the somatic data, the change in the risk level from low risk to high risk increases the probability of falls by a factor of 2.8 (p
ISSN:1179-1594
1179-1594
DOI:10.2147/RMHRS332326