Loading…

Evaluation of Ethanedinitrile as a Potential Fumigant against IPlasmodiophora brassicae/I, the Clubroot Pathogen

Clubroot, caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae Woronin, is one of the most challenging diseases to control in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) and other crucifers globally. Ethanedinitrile (EDN) is a promising fumigant shown to be effective against various pests and soil-borne pathogens. However, its...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Agronomy (Basel) 2023-04, Vol.13 (4)
Main Authors: Patar, Usha Rani, Manasova, Marie, Hnatek, Jonas, Wenzlova, Jana, Zouhar, Miloslav
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Clubroot, caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae Woronin, is one of the most challenging diseases to control in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) and other crucifers globally. Ethanedinitrile (EDN) is a promising fumigant shown to be effective against various pests and soil-borne pathogens. However, its efficacy against P. brassicae is yet to be tested. Therefore, the current study is focused on evaluating the effectiveness of EDN against P. brassicae at different rates, applied for different durations of exposure. Clubroot-susceptible oilseed rape plants, grown in fumigated soil, were evaluated for disease severity and growth parameters in greenhouse conditions. EDN exhibited good efficacy against the pathogen, with 81.39% disease suppression compared to the control. Complete control of the disease was achieved at the rates of 42 g/m[sup.3] and 50 g/m[sup.3] as well as in the treatment variant of 35 g/m[sup.3]-48 h. In addition, EDN improved plant health by increasing shoot weight by 58.24%. However, the combination of a prolonged fumigation period and higher rates resulted in a decline in the seedling emergence rate and plant shoot weight, indicating a potential adverse residual effect of higher rates and longer durations of exposure in plants.
ISSN:2073-4395
2073-4395
DOI:10.3390/agronomy13041177