Myelin quantification with MRI: A systematic review of accuracy and reproducibility

•All myelin MRI methods correlate fairly well (R2=0.54) with histology.•Reproducibility of all myelin MRI methods was good, except for MTR.•In preclinical studies, ihMTR and QSM showed highest correlations with histology.•In clinical studies MWF and MTR displayed highest correlation with histology.•...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2021-02, Vol.226, p.117561-117561, Article 117561
Main Authors: van der Weijden, Chris W.J., García, David Vállez, Borra, Ronald J.H., Thurner, Patrick, Meilof, Jan F., van Laar, Peter-Jan, Dierckx, Rudi A.J.O., Gutmann, Ingomar W., de Vries, Erik F.J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accuracy
Animals
Bias
Brain - diagnostic imaging
Brain - pathology
Demyelinating diseases
Histology
Humans
Inflammation
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Methods
Multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis - diagnostic imaging
Multiple Sclerosis - pathology
Myelin
Myelin sheath
Myelin Sheath - pathology
Neurodegenerative diseases
Reproducibility
Reproducibility of Results
Spinal Cord - diagnostic imaging
Spinal Cord - pathology
Systematic review
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•All myelin MRI methods correlate fairly well (R2=0.54) with histology.•Reproducibility of all myelin MRI methods was good, except for MTR.•In preclinical studies, ihMTR and QSM showed highest correlations with histology.•In clinical studies MWF and MTR displayed highest correlation with histology.•Large variation between studies indicate the need for standardization of myelin MRI. Currently, multiple sclerosis is treated with anti-inflammatory therapies, but these treatments lack efficacy in progressive disease. New treatment strategies aim to repair myelin damage and efficacy evaluation of such new therapies would benefit from validated myelin imaging techniques. Several MRI methods for quantification of myelin density are available now. This systematic review aims to analyse the performance of these MRI methods. Studies comparing myelin quantification by MRI with histology, the current gold standard, or assessing reproducibility were retrieved from PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase (until December 2019). Included studies assessed both myelin histology and MRI quantitatively. Correlation or variance measurements were extracted from the studies. Non-parametric tests were used to analyse differences in study methodologies. The search yielded 1348 unique articles. Twenty-two animal studies and 13 human studies correlated myelin MRI with histology. Eighteen clinical studies analysed the reproducibility. Overall bias risk was low or unclear. All MRI methods performed comparably, with a mean correlation between MRI and histology of R2=0.54 (SD=0.30) for animal studies, and R2=0.54 (SD=0.18) for human studies. Reproducibility for the MRI methods was good (ICC=0.75–0.93, R2=0.90–0.98, COV=1.3–27%), except for MTR (ICC=0.05–0.51). Overall, MRI-based myelin imaging methods show a fairly good correlation with histology and a good reproducibility. However, the amount of validation data is too limited and the variability in performance between studies is too large to select the optimal MRI method for myelin quantification yet.
ISSN:1053-8119
1095-9572
DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117561