Loading…

Roadmap to a more useful and usable electronic health record

A decade after the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, electronic health records (EHRs) largely remain poorly designed and contribute to clinician burnout. The purpose of this study was to understand clinicians’ wants, needs, and perceived barriers imposed by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cardiovascular digital health journal 2021-12, Vol.2 (6), p.301-311
Main Authors: Windle, John R., Windle, Thomas A., Shamavu, Ketemwabi Y., Nelson, Quinn M., Clarke, Martina A., Fruhling, Ann L., Tcheng, James E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A decade after the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, electronic health records (EHRs) largely remain poorly designed and contribute to clinician burnout. The purpose of this study was to understand clinicians’ wants, needs, and perceived barriers imposed by the EHR; implement best practices in user-centered design; and create a clinician-centered EHR framework validated via a functional EHR prototype. Usability evaluations were performed using a simulated patient with a complex clinical scenario. Convergent parallel mixed methods linked to action research and agile development were used to create an EHR prototype based on clinician-centered design. Prototype functionality was validated via a final usability evaluation. Between 2015 and 2017, 53 clinicians from 8 cardiology practices (4 academic and 4 private) participated in initial evaluations of their installed EHR. In 2019, 25 clinicians participated in final evaluations of their EHR vs our EHR prototype. Initial evaluations documented that clinicians judged the EHRs as poorly designed, scoring a mean of 47.1 on the System Usability Scale. Clinicians expressed that EHRs impeded workflow and communication and prolonged their workday. In the final evaluations, no improvement in installed EHRs was found (mean score 48.1); however, the EHR prototype was assessed as significantly more usable (mean score 77.8; P
ISSN:2666-6936
2666-6936
DOI:10.1016/j.cvdhj.2021.09.007