Neutrality, conflict, and structural determinants of health in a Jerusalem emergency department

Medical neutrality is a normative arrangement that differentiates a zone of medical treatment disconnected from the field of politics. While medical neutrality aims to ensure impartial healthcare for all and to shield the healthcare personnel from political demands, it can also divert attention away...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	International journal for equity in health 2022-06, Vol.21 (1), p.1-89, Article 89
Main Authors:	Orr, Zvika, Jackson, Levi, Alpert, Evan Avraham, Fleming, Mark D
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Analysis Arab people Conflict Content analysis Context Culture Demographic aspects Depoliticization Disadvantaged groups Emergency department Emergency medical care Emergency medical services Emergency service Ethnicity Health aspects Health care Health care disparities Health disparities Health insurance Health maintenance organizations Health promotion Health risks Health services Healthcare professionals HMOs Hospitals Humanitarianism Inequality Israel-Arab conflicts Jewish people Local elections Medical personnel Medical treatment Neutrality Patients Personnel Political aspects Politics Public health Qualitative analysis Social aspects Womens health
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Medical neutrality is a normative arrangement that differentiates a zone of medical treatment disconnected from the field of politics. While medical neutrality aims to ensure impartial healthcare for all and to shield the healthcare personnel from political demands, it can also divert attention away from conflicts and their effects on health inequity. This article analyzes how healthcare professionals understand and negotiate the depoliticized space of the emergency department (ED) through their views on neutrality. It also examines how medical staff use depoliticized concepts of culture to account for differences in the health status of patients from disadvantaged groups. These questions are examined in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Twenty-four in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare personnel in a Jerusalem hospital's ED. All but one of the participants were Jewish. The interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis and Grounded Theory. The ED staff endorsed the perspective of medical neutrality as a nondiscriminatory approach to care. At the same time, some medical staff recognized the limits of medical neutrality in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and negotiated and challenged this concept. While participants identified unique health risks for Arab patients, they usually did not associate these risks with the effects of conflict and instead explained them in depoliticized terms of cultural and behavioral differences. Culture served as a non-controversial way of acknowledging and managing problems that have their roots in politics. The normative demand for neutrality works to exclude discussion of the conflict from clinical spaces. The normative exclusion of politics is a vital but under-appreciated aspect of how political conflict operates as a structural determinant of health. Healthcare personnel, especially in the ED, should be trained in structural competency. This training may challenge the neglect of issues that need to be solved at the political level and enhance health equity, social justice, and solidarity.
ISSN:	1475-9276 1475-9276