Varying Opinions about Animal Welfare in the Australian Live Export Industry: A Survey

There is significant public interest in the Australian live animal export industry and a need to develop a program that can measure and monitor animal welfare throughout the supply chain. An online survey of stakeholder opinions of this industry and animal welfare measures was carried out in 2015 wi...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Animals (Basel) 2020-10, Vol.10 (10), p.1864
Main Authors:	Fleming, Patricia A, Wickham, Sarah L, Barnes, Anne L, Miller, David W, Collins, Teresa
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Acceptance Animal welfare Bans behaviour benchmarking Cattle industry Context Continuous improvement Environmental conditions Expected values Exports Factory farming Farmers Farms Indicators Intensive farming International trade Livestock Misalignment Perceptions physiology Polls & surveys Public concern quality assurance Sheep Social aspects social licence Stakeholders Supply chains Trade welfare indicators Workers
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	There is significant public interest in the Australian live animal export industry and a need to develop a program that can measure and monitor animal welfare throughout the supply chain. An online survey of stakeholder opinions of this industry and animal welfare measures was carried out in 2015 with 921 respondents: 30% from the public who identified as animal welfare advocates (AWAs); 44% from the public who did not identify as AWAs (general public; GP); 26% live export industry (LEI) workers. AWA and GP respondents expressed greater concern than LEI respondents for animal welfare throughout the supply chain but had less concern for animals at Australian feedlots than in other parts of the supply chain. The majority of AWA and GP respondents believed data collected on animal welfare should be made public and should be collected by independent welfare officers and used to regulate the industry and impose penalties for poor welfare. LEI workers believed that data should be confidential, collected by LEI workers and used by the industry to self-regulate. AWA and GP respondents rated the importance and practicality of a number of welfare indicators greater than LEI workers, while respondents shared an analogous view of the importance and practicality of these indicators. Results can be used to develop welfare assessments that ensure a better understanding between industry members and those not in the industry, while facilitating welfare improvements and promoting greater transparency for the live export industry.
ISSN:	2076-2615 2076-2615