‘Vindictiveness on Account of Colour’?: Race, Gender, and Class at the English Divorce Court, 1872–1939

This article uses 116 divorce or separation cases involving people of color between 1872 and 1940 to interrogate the role of the state in adjudicating racially mixed marriages in Britain. These examples demonstrate the rising population of imperial subjects within the U.K., but also that marital cas...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Genealogy (Basel) 2020-08, Vol.4 (3), p.82
Main Author:	Frost, Ginger
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Deportation Divorce empire gender Government archives Historians Husbands Judges & magistrates Marital separation Marriage migration Minority & ethnic groups Noncitizens Race Remarriage Trials Wives Women Working class
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	This article uses 116 divorce or separation cases involving people of color between 1872 and 1940 to interrogate the role of the state in adjudicating racially mixed marriages in Britain. These examples demonstrate the rising population of imperial subjects within the U.K., but also that marital cases could reverse in-migration, due to embarrassment and expense for all parties. In addition, gender and class factors limited the impact of race in the court. Men’s advantages in bringing cases overcame some racial prejudices, and rich men, whatever their color, could hire effective representation. Race only impacted divorce cases when women could play on stereotypes of violent men, or when men of color were co-respondents and thus broke up homes. Still, the number of undefended cases limited the influence of race in most divorce suits.
ISSN:	2313-5778 2313-5778